Pauline @Pops

The author of an initiative can see Admin TOS on its first acces to BO 1. What went wrong? After creating its first initiative, the author is granted access to the BO, and then has to agree with admin terms of use. 2. What did you expect to happen? - As a user, I expect no to be considered as an admin when editing my initiative. - As a super admin, I expect the admin TOS I created not to be seen by initiatives authors. 3. Where did you found this bug (which site)? On https://staging.decidim.codegram.com/ (0.22.0.dev) We think that it is not the right behavior for this participatory space, as the access to the BO is only granted to users so they can edit their initiative. They shouldn't be considered as regular admins regarding to admin TOS.

Make the number of characters allowed for the petitions description field configurable - Configurable field from the administration interface at the level of the initiatives type - (option) Take into account special cases related to the rich text editor (e.g. video embeded)" or disable the rich text editor.

Create statistic blocks for petitions No KPI is generated for petitions. Should be compiled : - Number (#) of petitions published --- # of petitions accepted (threshold met) --- # of petitions rejected (threshold no met) - # of signatures This should be compiled for both stats blocks that can be activated for home page : - Current state of [Org name] - Metrics

Display the creation of petitions in the activity blocks Blocks that are missing this information : - Public profile "Activity" tab - Recent activities home block - Last activity page

Link assemblies to PP page Hello everyone, Our client wants to access linked assemblies on PP presentation pages, as we currently can access a PP by clicking on its card on linked assemblies presentation page. As a user I want to be able to access to a linked assembly when navigating on a PP page. As an admin, when linking a PP to an assembly on the assembly config page, I want the link to go both ways. Now, the link is just visible on the Assemblies presentation page, but not on PP page. See mockup below

PR available here : https://github.com/decidim/decidim/pull/5838

Hi Sergi, thanks for the reply! My question was more about the visibility of a process groups with ...

Add joint file in step 4 of initiative wizard Add the possibility to submit a joint file on this step of initiative creation. What do you think should be the accepted extension types ?

Hi @carol do you have any insights about this ?

Token voting rule on Budget component Our client want the users to vote by allowing tokens to projects for the Budget component. Multiple tokens can be allowed to one project. As a user, I want to be able to give several votes of my total votes for the same project. To do this, I want to see next to each project a voting method allowing me to assign multiple votes for each project. As an admin, I want to be able to activate or deactivate this voting method in the admin panel (in the "voting rules" section of the Budget component), thanks to a checkbox. I also want to be able to have a field to configure : - the total number of votes a user can assign - the maximum number of votes that can be assigned to one project.

Thanks @carol ! This is awesome, we look forward to contributing with our devs :D

A process group with only private processes inside is still transparent In a process group only filled with private processes, non participants can still see the process group on the processes index. As an admin, when configuring a process group with private participatory processes, I expect the process group to be invisible for non participants in the processes index. Is this a bug or the normal behavior or process groups ?

We'd like to do it on the 0.20, in order to catch up the master

Maximum number of vote per project on Budget component Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.For participatory budgets, the admin can only set a min number of projects to be voted on, but in some cases, municipalities need to set a maximum, or a specific number of projects to be voted on. Describe the solution you'd likeAs an admin, I'd like to be able to set a maximum number of project, or to give a specific number of projects to be voted on.We'd like to improve the voting rule "Minimum number of projects to be voted on" by adding a new field: - `max`: Allow the admin to set a maximum number of projects to vote forThis development would also allow to set a specific number of projects to be voted on, if min = max. Funded byRoubaix

See here for more informations & mockup : Add filters option on the accountability component

Add filters option on the accountability component Hi everyone! A client is asking for an enhancement of the accountability component, as it present some usability issues. They would like to add filtering options on the results index in the FO : - enable areas as filters - enable categories as filters - enable subcategories as filters - enable timeline entry as filter - enable statuses as filter After discussing the issue with our tech team, we learned that it would be really hard to dev, so we'd love to know your insights. In order to avoid erasing the current vizualisation, it might be interesting to create a new display option with those filters.

Thanks for the answer! Actually, our client would be willing to improve the feature, by adding som...

Hi everyone! A client is asking for something like that and could be interested in this feature, di...

Hi Harmin, To create official proposals, you need to enable official proposals in the Proposal con...

Allow process admins to add private users One of our clients needs the platform to allow process admins to add private users. Right now, only super admins can add private users to private processes.