New comment at Maximum number of vote per project on Budget component
Maximum number of vote per project on Budget component Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.For participatory budgets, the admin can only set a min number of projects to be voted on, but in some cases, municipalities need to set a maximum, or a specific number of projects to be voted on. Describe the solution you'd likeAs an admin, I'd like to be able to set a maximum number of project, or to give a specific number of projects to be voted on.We'd like to add a voting rule "Maximum number of projects to be voted on" and to add a new field: - `max`: Allow the admin to set a maximum number of projects to vote forThis voting rule wouldn't be compatible with the "Percentage of budget" rule, but would be compatible with the "Min number of projects to be voted on" rule, as this would also allow to set a specific number of projects to be voted on, if min = max. When activated, this voting rule allows the user to go over budget. As a user, I want to be able to understand how many projects I have to vote for in order to confirm my vote. Add a layout to explain the configured voting rules, as it already exists for Proposals.Hide progress bar when this feature is enabled Funded byRoubaix
Add filters option on the accountability component Hi everyone! A client is asking for an enhancement of the accountability component, as it present some usability issues. They would like to add filtering options on the results index in the FO : - enable areas as filters - enable categories as filters - enable subcategories as filters - enable timeline entry as filter - enable statuses as filter After discussing the issue with our tech team, we learned that it would be really hard to dev, so we'd love to know your insights. In order to avoid erasing the current vizualisation, it might be interesting to create a new display option with those filters.
New comment at Create official proposal
User group can endorse several times a same proposal Hi everyone, 1. What went wrong? After endorsing a proposal on Metadecidim, @virgile_deville and I realized both of us had endorsed the same proposal, with both our personal accounts and on behalf of our user group, @OSP. 2. What did you expect to happen? When two users of the same organization endorse/vote for the same proposal on behalf of the group, I expect the platform to take into account one vote/endorsement only. 3. Where did you found this bug (which site)? On Metadecidim Thank you!
Add a "Return" button in the FO to get back to indexes As a user, when clicking on a card on the Index, I want to be able to return to the list of cards (index) easily. This button should be available on the cards of : - Proposals - Results (accountability component) - News - Meetings - Sortitions - Debates
New comment at The Google + sharing button should be deleted on Decidim
To improve the Terms of Service (TOS) block in the sign up Hi everyone, We think the TOS block should be a lot more appealing and understandable for the user. We want to improve the transparency of that kind of text, but the fact that this block doesn't take into account the headings and the formatting of the text is making the TOS really hard to read. We'd like this block to be a lot more readable for users (by accepting the different headings and formatting).
The Google + sharing button should be deleted on Decidim Hi everyone, As Google + has been closed by Google, the Google + button shouldn't appear anymore with the sharing buttons. Thanks :)
I can see comments and endorsements icons when they are disabled Hi everyone, Our clients at OSP don't understand why, when disabled, comments and endorsements icons are displayed on the cards. The issue has already been discussed last year, but is a real problem for us because if we decide to hide it, we are forced to hide it on the whole platform. Have the opinion of the product team evolved on this issue ? Thank you for your thoughts. Previous Github issue : https://github.com/decidim/decidim/issues/4005 Previous Metadecidim issue : https://meta.decidim.org/processes/bug-report/f/210/proposals/13091
A password helper during the registration process We think the UX of the registration process would be better if the user could see the parameters missing while completing his password. In fact, a lot of clients are reporting user difficulties at the moment of registration. The necessity to enter complex passwords may discourage some users. You can find a mockup of what it could look like :
Statistics automatically displayed when creating a new participatory process 1. When creating a new participatory process, when I don't check the "Show statistics" box, the statistics are displayed on the user panel anyway. I have to come back in the information sub-menu of the process in the admin panel to uncheck this parameter. 2. Expected behavior When not checking the "show statistics" parameter, I want the statistics hidden on my process. 3. Decidim installation: [staging.decidim.codegram.com] Github issue : https://github.com/decidim/decidim/issues/5477 4. Thank you for your help ! :D