Aquest lloc web fa servir cookies pròpies i de tercers per millorar l’experiència de navegació, i oferir continguts i serveis d’interès. En continuar la navegació entenem que acceptes la nostra política de cookies. Per a més informació consulta aquí.
DecidimFest 2019. Barcelona, Octubre 29-31 :: Participa al Call4Nodes! - -
Ivan Vergés
@microstudi
Telecommunication Engineer - Developer & Musician. Mantaining http://goteo.org and spreading Decidim . Working with @platoniq on open-governance tools. GNU/linux user.
microstudi.net
Participant verificat/da
Seguidores

7
Seguint

29
Insígnies
  • 17 de Jul 12:17
  • Nova proposta a Notifica una Bug (Errors o Incidències)
    Detected language does not work as expected
    The default language detected by Decidim does not always work as expected and does not respect organization defaults. Currently, it tries to detect the user's default language from the browser's Accept-Language header. But that only works if this header is 2 chars long (ie: 'ca' will be detected, 'ca-ES' won't be detected). Full header are usually like 'es,en-US;q=0.8,ca;q=0.5,en;q=0.3'. Also, when the language is not detected (or does not exists in Decidim) fallback to the default language configured in the application code and ignores the default language from the organization. This is the PR that solves this: https://github.com/decidim/decidim/pull/5272
  • 05 de Jul 13:52
  • Nova proposta a Proposa noves funcionalitats
    Allow multi-choice questions in consultations
    This is another improvement for consultations. It allows the admin to configure multiple choices for a particular question. This will allow the participant to vote between a range of a minimum and a maximum number, according to configuration. Screenshot attachment is provided with the relevant UI changes. Among the changes these are relevant: 1. A new configuration section on the question admin panel. Instead of mixing everything in the information section, I find more usable to create a specific section for creating advanced configuration. 2. If no configuration is done, or maximum number of votes is 1, then the regular modal window is shown (nothing changes from the actual behavior). 3. If more than 1 choice is allowed, a new page is presented to the user, with checkboxes. Javascript and internal logic will validate the maximum-minimum values. Counter will decrease according to the number of options chosen. 4. Public results page for the question will add a widget to inform users about the rules applied and the number of unique users participating a part from the total number of votes for every choice.
  • 28 de Jun 17:48
  • Nova proposta a Proposa noves funcionalitats
    Add verifications to consultation questions
    I want to add verifications per question in a consultation. Same way as you can restrict some actions in some components to certain verificated users. This would add the 🔑 icon in the questions list (see attachment) and one action possible: "vote". If a questions is restricted, then only users with permission to vote would see the vote button.
  • 10 de Jun 18:40
  • Nova proposta a Proposa noves funcionalitats
    Add an admin result page for consultations
    Currently, there's no way to view the results of a consultation prior publication of results. This PR solves that by adding a page in the consultation's admin that shows the number of votes so far if the consultations is active. If the consultation has finished, then it shows the results in the admin before publishing it. See PR here: https://github.com/decidim/decidim/pull/5188
  • 30 de Mai 18:34
  • Nova proposta a Proposa noves funcionalitats
    Clarify the terms of the APGL license and its relation with the Social Contract
    I recently received a comment in my Decidim installation guide asking if the adoption of the Social Contract was mandatory to install Decidim. Please see all the discussion here to understand the context (I encourage everybody to read the thread): https://github.com/Platoniq/decidim-install/issues/30 As a summary: I said that the only legal constraint is the AGPL license and the Social Contract is about being part of the Decidim community. However, it seems that the social contract itself does not clarify this aspect and he proposes to change that. QUOTING: I suggest replacing this sentence from the Social Contract "The use and development of the Decidim platform by an institution or social group of any kind involves the full and integral acceptance of, and commitment to, this social-contract." by this one: The Decidim software is covered by the AGPL license. [You can use it, modify it and redistribute derived versions of it you respect the AGPL license.] Contributions to the Decidim software are moderated by the Decidim association. You are welcome to take part of our association if you accept our Social Contract. Similarily, using the decidim.org platform requires you to respect our Social Contract. END OF QUOTE I am not sure if this should be exactly the change needed but I agree with the spirit. I would be nice to hear everybody's opinion on this matter.
Creative Commons License Web creada amb programari lliure.

Si us plau, inicia sessió

Has oblidat la teva contrasenya?

O