Nou comentari a UX simplification of initiatives for broader use cases

Hi @virgile_deville, the features you propose look good! The only thing I don't understand is the gl...

Nou comentari a Voting rules on budget module

PR on opensource's fork: https://github.com/OpenSourcePolitics/decidim/pull/772

Nou comentari a Let participants create meetings on participatory processes

Hey! I see that the proposal is accepted and that there funding. Will it be done?

Nou comentari a Error on meetings page / upcoming meetings

Yep! Is like u said! Same happened to me.

I also leave a related proposal: When you create a meeti...

Nou comentari a Error on meetings page / upcoming meetings

Could you tell me how to reproduce the error? I dn't get it

Nova proposta a Notifica una Bug (Errors o Incidències)

The evolution of the result presents visualization problems [component accountability]

The accountability component works as follows: 1- Indicate mother category and subcategory to a result. 2- This result can have children. That is, being a mother result. 3- The results (mothers and children) can indicate the evolution of the result. 4- The evolution of the mother result is not shown if there are child results. 5- The evolution of a child result is not shown. To reproduce in a mother result: 1- Create result 2- Indicate evolution of the result 3- Create children results 4- The evolution of the result disappears from the public part Video: https://imgur.com/a/Bg8gx1q To reproduce in a child result: 1- Create result child 2- Indicate evolution of the child result 3- The evolution of the child result is not shown.

Nou comentari a The results within a project are not shown chronologically in the public view

As I said in the proposal, I ping @carol, @arnau

Nova proposta a Notifica una Bug (Errors o Incidències)

The results within a project are not shown chronologically in the public view

To reproduce the error: 1- Enable the component accountability 2- Create a result 3- Add results within the created result 4- Note that if we are adding results in the backend it is sorted chronologically and in the public view in order of creation. I don't know if this really is a bug or a feature. In the comment I ping a product if they could answer the question.

Nou comentari a API: help or examples

Hi @kdw2060, I am not a developer, but it always helps me to look at the epics of how things were bu...

Nou comentari a Reunió 30/09/2019

Really happy to see the coordination sessions. Thank you :D

Nou comentari a I wasn't able to sign up via facebook/google.

Hi @gj, this is already reported here: Register by oauth is broken.
I think this is an incidence of...

Nou comentari a Add traceability to process groups

Hi, PR open: https://github.com/decidim/decidim/pull/5278

Nou comentari a Clarify the terms of the APGL license and its relation with the Social Contract

Nice! Thanks @carol and @microstudi

Nou comentari a Clarify the terms of the APGL license and its relation with the Social Contract

Hi @carol, thanks for summarizing.

I agree with what you comment. Just one note.

I think that the...

Nou comentari a Searching a private content can be possible not being a allowed user to that content

Hi @carol, currently don't exist transparent processes. That's the problem. What you comment does no...

Nou comentari a Searching a private content can be possible not being a allowed user to that content

Yep @JeanLuc_1974, you are right with 1). What I am not sure is the 2). What I comment in the first ...

Nou comentari a Searching a private content can be possible not being a allowed user to that content

Hi @JeanLuc_1974. Searching a private content is possible. "Private" means that only "private partic...

Nou comentari a Al ocultar un comentario publicitario en un encuentro, este no se elimina de la página de inicio de Erabaki

Buenas @Ikirax,

Tienes razón. De hecho, no solo pasa en el "activity block".
Se reproduce el erro...

Nova proposta a Proposa noves funcionalitats

Add traceability to process groups

Hi, Currently, the changes that exist in the process group are not reflected in the Adminlog. This was reported: https://meta.decidim.org/processes/bug-report/f/210/proposals/14633 From @coditramuntana we'd like to contribute to make this functionality possible. We believe that this action goes in the line of the section of Transparency, traceability and integrity of the social contract (https://docs.decidim.org/social-contract/en/social-contract/) Improvement: We will add the CRUD actions of process groups to the administrator's ActionLog.