258 Results for the search: "#change"

I agree with the discoverability issue that this change adds. Regarding docs, we should add this new section on the README (where there's all the modules listing), and also add it on the checklist.

This way, it would not change anything in the technical backend of this setting but would just move the configuration to another UI. The technical elegancy of this approach.

I suggest we would add a new notification setting in the user's personal notification settings under My account > Notification settings. This setting would obviously only be visible for users...

This would be a very welcomed changed. We have also conducted a usability testing session where the budgeting feature has raised a lot of issues that I believe these changes address. We are also...

The reasons behind the move from cancancan to an in-house solution for permissions were discussed back when the change was proposed, but basically cancancan allowed modules to modify permissions...

I see that this is archived as "funding available". Is it being developed by anyone?
I also think that would be great not to just be able to configure the variables but to more in-depth changes in...

@microstudi
Yes, that is what the module does but it does not work well for large "sets" of customizable terms. While the tool itself could be improved, I don't think in reality there will be many...

While I'm at it, I may add here that also the word "Process" has gotten a lot of critique here in Finland. Some cities for instance refused to take the system into use unless that term is...

Also, to note that the words "Project" (Budgets module) and "Result" (Accountability module) have received some criticism but not so much as the ones mentioned previously.For customizing these...

I think this idea should get more thought in wider context.For example, in Finland, we have head lots of complaints about the word "proposal". Not only from one client but from every single one. It...

Were these changes made? I'm running into the same issue here in New York.

Is there a reason we didn't change the name of the committee in the proposal title and description ?

We talked about being more data driven in our approach to accept new functionnalities.
Data could be quantitative such as data usage justifying a change or even a detailed user story based on a...

How about we use the Theory of Change framework to go into details about our mission / vision statement ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_change(Let me know if I should turn this into a...

Thanks!From that repository I can find the following changes they have done to achieve this:

Added a new before action in application controller as we did as well. But they didn't make it...

And another change we also did is that we disabled signing up to the system for that instance since they are using their internal OpenID connect based authentication method to verify that the users...

We just added a new configuration flag in the config/application.rb (or any of the environment configs) that forces login.Changes that we did in Decidim with this flag:
- Modify the...

I agree that it's not easy to accomplish and would require a lot of refactoring on the codebase. The biggest issue is that the markup in all components/views is quite attached to Foundation which...

I've couldn't reproduce it. I've been able to change the details for the consultation as well as the question.

Even though it might seem a minor change, it isn't - as a participatory process can have several "proposal" components (or of any other kind), so where to point the user?Discussion about the same...