1.1.

This process shall take place publicly on the Metadecidim platform and shall be conducted as follows:

1. Preparation Phase: A Drafting Committee, composed of community volunteers, is constituted to identify key topics requiring regulation.

2. Agenda Setting:
- The community is invited to comment on proposed topics and suggest additional areas for regulation.
- The Drafting Committee prioritizes topics and establishes working groups to develop drafts for the most urgent regulatory matters.

3. First Deliberative Cycle.
- Drafting: The Drafting Committee prepares initial drafts of priority topics.
- Community Deliberation: The drafts shall be subject to community discussion through participatory texts, online events, and eventually expert-facilitated dialogues.

4. Second Deliberative Cycle.
- Drafting: The Drafting Committee shall refine existing drafts based on the community feedback, and develop drafts for the second round of prioritized topics. - Community Deliberation: A second round of participatory discussion shall take place to further refine the second round of prioritized topics.

5. Review and Approval.
- Feedback Integration: The Drafting Committee consolidates community feedback into a revised version of the regulation.
- Coordination Committee Review: The Coordination Committee reviews the proposed text. In a joint meeting with the Drafting Committee, it approves, modifies or rejects the final version for submission to the General Assembly.
- General Assembly Vote: Each article approved by the Coordination Committee shall be submitted to the General Assembly for approval through a vote based on the majority rule.