Propose new features

Fingerprint

The piece of text below is a shortened, hashed representation of this content. It's useful to ensure the content hasn't been tampered with, as a single modification would result in a totally different value.

Value: ed853053bd0181f0b1605a37c8e0c3345a12f9059395dbf4da867b88299223d2

Source: {"body":{"es":"**Need**\r\nA client wants to configure a process so that from a set of proposals, users can evaluate its importance with a 1-10 scale, not just with a simple support action as now. This way, when aggregating all evaluations we have a better understanding of the grade of importance to the community. \r\n\r\n**Implementation idea**\r\nExtend the current support action (votes). You could configure the Supports as Normal (currrent), or Scale, which by default would provide a 1-10 scale. \r\n\r\n**UX**\r\nWhen configured as Scale, users would be shown something like: \r\n\r\n----\r\n\"Evaluate the importance of this proposal\"\r\n[less important --------- more important]\r\n1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 \r\n----\r\n\r\n**Admin**\r\nfor each proposal admins would be shown the average evaluation, and maybe the # of votes for each scale step. Also we could provide a way to export the results as CSV for further analysis in external tools. \r\n\r\nIf this is interesting, the extension of support modes ideally would support N modes, so others can implement other ways of evaluating. Although this would make more complex the implementation.\r\n\r\nAlso, ideas about the best way to implement this are more than welcome. \r\n\r\nFunding available (for a basic implementation)"},"title":{"es":"Provide new option to support a proposal: with a scale"}}

This fingerprint is calculated using a SHA256 hashing algorithm. In order to replicate it yourself, you can use an MD5 calculator online and copy-paste the source data. ×