Propose new features
Designing Decidim together
Provide new option to support a proposal: with a scale
This proposal is being evaluated
List of Endorsements
Report inappropriate content
Is this content inappropriate?
We use cookies to ensure the basic functionalities of the website and to enhance your online experience. You can choose for each category to opt-in/out whenever you want.
These cookies are essential for the proper functioning of my website. Without these cookies, the website would not work properly.
These cookies allow the website to remember the choices you have made in the past
Analytics cookies are cookies that track how users navigate and interact with a website. The information collected is used to help the website owner improve the website.
These cookies collect information about how you use the website, which pages you visited and which links you clicked on.
Designing Decidim together
This proposal is being evaluated
The piece of text below is a shortened, hashed representation of this content. It's useful to ensure the content hasn't been tampered with, as a single modification would result in a totally different value.
Value:
ed853053bd0181f0b1605a37c8e0c3345a12f9059395dbf4da867b88299223d2
Source:
{"body":{"es":"**Need**\r\nA client wants to configure a process so that from a set of proposals, users can evaluate its importance with a 1-10 scale, not just with a simple support action as now. This way, when aggregating all evaluations we have a better understanding of the grade of importance to the community. \r\n\r\n**Implementation idea**\r\nExtend the current support action (votes). You could configure the Supports as Normal (currrent), or Scale, which by default would provide a 1-10 scale. \r\n\r\n**UX**\r\nWhen configured as Scale, users would be shown something like: \r\n\r\n----\r\n\"Evaluate the importance of this proposal\"\r\n[less important --------- more important]\r\n1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 \r\n----\r\n\r\n**Admin**\r\nfor each proposal admins would be shown the average evaluation, and maybe the # of votes for each scale step. Also we could provide a way to export the results as CSV for further analysis in external tools. \r\n\r\nIf this is interesting, the extension of support modes ideally would support N modes, so others can implement other ways of evaluating. Although this would make more complex the implementation.\r\n\r\nAlso, ideas about the best way to implement this are more than welcome. \r\n\r\nFunding available (for a basic implementation)"},"title":{"es":"Provide new option to support a proposal: with a scale"}}
This fingerprint is calculated using a SHA256 hashing algorithm. In order to replicate it yourself, you can use an MD5 calculator online and copy-paste the source data.
<script src="https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/14931/embed.js"></script>
<noscript><iframe src="https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/14931/embed.html" frameborder="0" scrolling="vertical"></iframe></noscript>
Is this content inappropriate?
You need to enable all cookies in order to see this content.
Change cookie settings
17 comments
Loading comments ...
Add your comment
Sign in with your account or sign up to add your comment.
Loading comments ...