Report a Bug

Fingerprint

The piece of text below is a shortened, hashed representation of this content. It's useful to ensure the content hasn't been tampered with, as a single modification would result in a totally different value.

Value: 8175d03f5a76b09cd451137182c4e17c52949d8e6fd3eaf5e58f636d55e39c2d

Source: {"body":{"es":"Following the proposal made by @xabier and accepted (https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/12143?locale=es) I think that the context vocabulary in initiative should be more neutral. \r\n\r\nFor example (see imatge attached)\r\n\r\n1- When you are creating the initiative refers to the City Council. I would put the name of the organization instead of \"town hall\".\r\n2- On a generic level, I would talk about initiatives. No citizenship initiatives.\r\n3- Do not make reference to the scope of the initiative. Now it shows \"city\" or \"district\". Limit the text to \"territorial or sectorial scope\".\r\n4- The last page (once the initiative is created) gives information (I believe) that is fulfilled in the case of decidim.barcelona exclusively. It should be an editable text.\r\n\r\nIf you believe that it is not a bug, I will move the proposal to the other process."},"title":{"es":"Neutral terminology in initiatives"}}

This fingerprint is calculated using a SHA256 hashing algorithm. In order to replicate it yourself, you can use an MD5 calculator online and copy-paste the source data. ×