This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about it here.
#BeaMember - A new form of commitment to Decidim
Decidim

Last activity

Type
Results per page:
  • 03/04/2020 15:23
  • New proposal at Propose new functionalities for Decidim software
    Better UX - Make the listing cards more simple
    **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**I don't like how cluttered the listing cards are with information. E.g. proposal cards or process cards, why do we need to show so many things on the cards? Such as how many people are following it, when it was created, etc. And with the process cards we are showing 3 dates: start date, end date and creation date (which by the way does not have a label).Is the user really interested in all this? Especially the follows section is quite obfuscated in case the user is already following the participatory space. Why do we even show this to the user if they are already following it? And the button says "you are already following..." and then when you click it, it states "stop following". Even I would find it hard to understand if I didn't use Decidim before. **Describe the solution you'd like**Remove all unnecessary details from the cards. E.g. proposal card we are only interested about:Proposal titleProposal descriptionPossibly: number of commentsPossibly: number of supports (when supports are enabled)On the process cards I'm interested about:Process titleProcess descriptionCluttering these elements with a lot of information brings many accessibility issues, not only visually confusing but also confusing for the screen reader users. Most of this information does not need to be always visible on the cards.**Describe alternatives you've considered**Just hide most of the additional details on the cards. **Additional context**In some cases it can be justified to show some extra information, such as the meeting dates. However, with proposals, processes, etc. we're not generally that interested in those dates that they would have to be shown on the cards. Users can still get that information on the process pages. **Does this issue could impact on users private data?** Nope.
  • 03/04/2020 14:08
  • New proposal at Propose new functionalities for Decidim software
    Adding icons to pages and topics
    **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**Our client would like to add icons to the pages and topics to visually differentiate different types of pages and topics on the "Help" pages. **Describe the solution you'd like**Add possibility to define icons for pages and topics. **Describe alternatives you've considered**The whole CMS should be thought out from ground up, as the current CMS features of Decidim are very limited. This could be part of thinking how to manage content and navigational structures within the system in the bigger picture (e.g. navigating Metadecidim to find the feature proposal form takes 4 clicks if you're already signed in, is this good usability?). **Additional context** Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.Related ideas:Allow defining static page content using the content blocksAllow adding multiple same type of content blocks on pagePossibility to configure the top level navigationPossibility to configure the participatory space navigation **Does this issue could impact on users private data?*Nope.
  • 03/04/2020 13:53
  • New proposal at Report a Bug
    Some activity types are never shown on activities block/page
    Copy of : https://github.com/decidim/decidim/issues/5926Types not shown are Assembly, Consultation, Initiative and Participatory process.This is specially relevant in the 'all activities' page, where those types can even be selected in the left side filter, to always result in an empty list.All the affected types are Participable and don't have a participatory_space.
  • 01/04/2020 15:25
  • New proposal at Report a Bug
    Posting a comment is very slow
    Has anyone else noticed that only recently it takes ages (in computer terms) to post a comment? This seems to apply to the very latest versions of Decidim, I've noticed this in the current development versions as well as Metadecidim. It used to be "lightning" fast compared to the current situation.I just posted a comment on Metadecidim and timed it took more than 15 seconds for the comment to appear in the UI. This seems wrong, it should be instantly visible or take maximum of 2 seconds.
Creative Commons License Website made with free software.

Please sign in

Forgot your password?

Or