This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about it here.
#BeaMember - A new form of commitment to Decidim
Decidim

Last activity

Type
Results per page:
  • 21/02/2020 10:16
  • New proposal at Report a Bug
    Error in configuration limit of files to be uploaded in the process of user vali...
    In multitenance environment version 0.19-stable does not allow to modify the upload size for the images of the user validation process by DNI. In the file /config/initializaters/decidim.rb is configured the parameter config.maximum_attachment_size = 5.megabytes the nginx server is correctly configured with the client_max_body_size 5M parameter; Attached errbit output of the error:
  • 21/02/2020 10:04
  • New proposal at Propose new functionalities for Decidim software
    Token voting rule on Budget component
    Our client want the users to vote by allowing tokens to projects for the Budget component. Multiple tokens can be allowed to one project. As a user, I want to be able to give several votes of my total votes for the same project. To do this, I want to see next to each project a voting method allowing me to assign multiple votes for each project. As an admin, I want to be able to activate or deactivate this voting method in the admin panel (in the "voting rules" section of the Budget component), thanks to a checkbox. I also want to be able to have a field to configure : - the total number of votes a user can assign - the maximum number of votes that can be assigned to one project.
  • 20/02/2020 16:09
  • New proposal at Report a Bug
    A process group with only private processes inside is still transparent
    In a process group only filled with private processes, non participants can still see the process group on the processes index. As an admin, when configuring a process group with private participatory processes, I expect the process group to be invisible for non participants in the processes index. Is this a bug or the normal behavior or process groups ?
  • 20/02/2020 11:51
  • New proposal at Report a Bug
    Registro de bots (spam)
    Estamos teniendo problemas en algunas instalaciones de Decidim debido a que se están registrando usuarios a través de bots que introducen contenido publicitario en su perfil y no desarrollan ninguna otra actividad. Ejemplos en metadecidim: * https://meta.decidim.org/search?filter%5Bdecidim_scope_id%5D=&filter%5Bresource_type%5D=Decidim%3A%3AUser&filter%5Bterm%5D=a&locale=es&page=6 * https://meta.decidim.org/profiles/AngelinZN/activity?locale=es * https://meta.decidim.org/profiles/AlmagestovMR/activity?locale=es En definitiva, en metadecidim tengamos probablemente más de 100 usuarios-bots-spam registrados, ... y también en otras instalaciones de las que adjunto una imagen ... ¿Alguna idea de cómo resolver esto? Gracias!
  • 18/02/2020 09:25
  • New proposal at Report a Bug
    Organization's census uploading fails
    In the Admin Dashboard, I go to Participants -> Verifications -> Organization's census. When I select a .csv file with a list of e-mails (single column, no commas, no headers) and push "Upload", I get the following message: There was a problem with our server Please try again later. Expected behavior: no error message and census is updated. Site: meta.decidim.org
  • 17/02/2020 11:54
  • New proposal at Propose new functionalities for Decidim software
    Vote per project enhancement on Budget module
    At Open Source Politics, we developed a new voting rule for Budgets component, allowing the users to vote on a number of projects set by the admin (see : https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/13275). We'd like to improve it by adding new fields in the admin : - `min`: Allow the admin to set a minimum number of projects to vote for - `max`: Allow the admin to set a maximum number of projects to vote for - `equals to` Allow the admin to set a total number of projects to vote for The goal is to merge those improvements on the master as soon as possible.
  • 12/02/2020 08:44
  • New proposal at Report a Bug
    Tamaño del archivo del Documento de Identidad - Falta de aviso
    A la hora de subir el documento de identidad, nos hemos encontrado con usuarias que subían archivos demasiado grandes. El problema es que no notifica que ese es el problema, y varía desde indicar que campo del número de documento no es correcto (para desconcierto del usuario) y un error422 tras varios intentos. Sería interesante que si el problema es el tamaño de archivo, se avisara (igual que se indica las mayúsculas en el campo del número del documento), y/o una notificación de error concreta si se sube el archivo pero este es grande.
Creative Commons License Website made with free software.

Please sign in

Forgot your password?

Or