Changes at "2.3.1. "
.jpg)
Title (English)
- +2.3.1.
Body (English)
- +Amendment submission: Association members can create amendment proposals all year long on a dedicated Metadecidim component, in two categories: Minor corrections Amendments or additions based on actual practice within the community. They must include: an explanation of why it’s an improvement to the regulation. An example of how or when it was experimented
- +2. Proposal selection: The Coordination Committee eliminates the proposals which are invalid based on the following criteria: proposals out of the scope of application of the internal regulation. proposals going against the social contract. proposals going against the statutes. proposals based on anticipation rather than on reality.
- +3. Community questions: All the community can comment during a minimum of two weeks on the amendments proposals, to understand the proposal better and ask for clarifications. The proposing party is responsible to respond to requests for clarification.
- +4. Community feedback: All the community can comment for a minimum of 2 weeks on the amendments proposals, to give feedback to the amendments proposals, andexpress concerns, suggestions, or doubts. The proposing party may no longer respond to discussion.
- +5. Feedback integration: During a minimum of 2 weeks, the proposer improves or withdraws the proposal based on community feedback.
- +6. Objection harvesting: During a minimum of two weeks, the Community and the Coordination Committee perform a final check on the proposal amendments before the General Assembly vote, to ensure the proposal is still valid in regard to step 2.
- +7. General Assembly Vote: The final amendments shall be presented for approval by the General Assembly.
Share