This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about cookies.
Skip to main content
Metadecidim's official logo
  • English Triar la llengua Elegir el idioma Choose language
    • Català
    • Castellano
Sign Up Sign In
  • Home
  • Processes
  • Assemblies
  • Initiatives
  • Consultations
  • Conferences
  • Help

Propose new functionalities for Decidim software

#DecidimRoadmap Designing Decidim together

Phase 1 of 1
Open 2019-01-01 - 2030-12-31
Process phases Submit a proposal
  • The process
  • Debates
  • Propose new features
  • News
chevron-left Back to list

Budgets Admins experience enhancements

Avatar: Lucas Hamani Lucas Hamani
22/02/2019 11:20  

As of today, most of our clients (@OSP) use Decidim for participatory budgets and we have been collecting users (admins in this case) feedbacks for the last few months.

All of them concern the difficulty when it comes to process them after the proposal phase has ended. Here a few examples :
- "When I exported the proposals, I realized that some of them were actually withdrawn proposals. I had to look for them on the platform again to update my export."
-"It was very painful to process 300 proposals (only displaying 15 per page) with no filtering or ordering capacities in the proposals back office"
-"To analyze the proposals, we export them and assign them to the administration services qualified to assess their feasibility. Once a service gave its feedback, I had go through all the proposals in the back office to find the one or few proposals I wanted to answer to."

We propose to address those admins difficulties through a series of enhancements. We already started to work on some of them, others are still works in progress. You can find them here => https://github.com/OpenSourcePolitics/decidim/milestone/10.

We plan to test and iterate on them before considering any merge.

List of Endorsements

Avatar: Pau Parals Pau Parals verified-badge
Endorsements count1
Budgets Admins experience enhancements Comments 0

Reference: MDC-PROP-2019-02-14276
Version number 1 (of 1) see other versions
Check fingerprint

Fingerprint

The piece of text below is a shortened, hashed representation of this content. It's useful to ensure the content hasn't been tampered with, as a single modification would result in a totally different value.

Value: da7bbf63b18ba633ba0189c648726fd86ab9fcd0954b25242156587aeb98b0ca

Source: {"body":{"en":"As of today, most of our clients (@OSP) use Decidim for participatory budgets and we have been collecting users (admins in this case) feedbacks for the last few months. \r\n\r\nAll of them concern the difficulty when it comes to process them after the proposal phase has ended. Here a few examples :\r\n- \"When I exported the proposals, I realized that some of them were actually withdrawn proposals. I had to look for them on the platform again to update my export.\"\r\n-\"It was very painful to process 300 proposals (only displaying 15 per page) with no filtering or ordering capacities in the proposals back office\"\r\n-\"To analyze the proposals, we export them and assign them to the administration services qualified to assess their feasibility. Once a service gave its feedback, I had go through all the proposals in the back office to find the one or few proposals I wanted to answer to.\"\r\n\r\nWe propose to address those admins difficulties through a series of enhancements. We already started to work on some of them, others are still works in progress. You can find them here => https://github.com/OpenSourcePolitics/decidim/milestone/10.\r\n\r\nWe plan to test and iterate on them before considering any merge."},"title":{"en":"Budgets Admins experience enhancements"}}

This fingerprint is calculated using a SHA256 hashing algorithm. In order to replicate it yourself, you can use an MD5 calculator online and copy-paste the source data.

Share:

link-intact Share link

Share link:

Please paste this code in your page:

<script src="https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/14276/embed.js"></script>
<noscript><iframe src="https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/14276/embed.html" frameborder="0" scrolling="vertical"></iframe></noscript>

Report inappropriate content

Is this content inappropriate?

Reason

0 comments

Order by:
  • Older
    • Best rated
    • Recent
    • Older
    • Most discussed

Add your comment

Sign in with your account or sign up to add your comment.

Loading comments ...

  • Terms and conditions of use
  • About the community
  • Download Open Data files
  • Metadecidim at Twitter Twitter
  • Metadecidim at Instagram Instagram
  • Metadecidim at YouTube YouTube
  • Metadecidim at GitHub GitHub
Creative Commons License Website made with free software.
Decidim Logo

Confirm

OK Cancel

Please sign in

decidim Sign in with Decidim Barcelona
Or

Sign up

Forgot your password?