UGC Meeting reviews by the admin
Is your feature request related to a problem? A clear and concise description of what the problem is.
As an admin I'm frustrated to have to hide proposal or meetings for small reasons. Our client from the EU Commission tell us that for the Grand Débat she had a a priori moderation system for user generated meetings. She was very frustrated not to be able to publish a meeting because it would simple correction. One example she gave was that the link to the online meeting was not working.
Describe the solution you'd like
Several solutions were discussed with the client
- As admin I can temporaly hide a meeting, except from author, while the admin ask him a couple modifications via private conversations.
- Another approached would be to allow the admin to flag meetings that he has reviewed. User generated meetings that have not been flagged as reviewed would not be hidden and could be accessible using a filter. Reviewed once could have a different color or an icon signaling they were reviewed. While waiting to be flagged the admin can ask modifications to the user so it can mark as reviewed its meeting.
Describe alternatives you've considered
We thought of using the moderation system for this but once a meeting is hidden the url display an error message for the author and the admin.
Does this issue could impact on users private data?
EU Commission might fund this.
This proposal has been rejected because:
With the current functionality it is possible to solve this need: the admin sends a private message to the author of a meeting and she edits it. There's no need to hide anything temporarily.
Report inappropriate content
Is this content inappropriate?