This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about cookies.
Skip to main content
Metadecidim's official logo
  • English Triar la llengua Elegir el idioma Choose language
    • Català
    • Castellano
Sign Up Sign In
  • Home
  • Processes
  • Assemblies
  • Initiatives
  • Consultations
  • Conferences
  • Help

Propose new functionalities for Decidim software

#DecidimRoadmap Designing Decidim together

Phase 1 of 1
Open 2019-01-01 - 2030-12-31
Process phases Submit a proposal
  • The process
  • Debates
  • Propose new features
  • News
chevron-left Back to list

User's private activity about budgeting votes

Avatar: Antti Hukkanen Antti Hukkanen
22/09/2021 11:28  
Accepted / In progress

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Decidim provides a user activity timeline at /profiles/nickname/activity.

Here the service shows what the user has done within the service and the user can also see privately what they have done in private spaces.

However, in the acitivity feed there is no information about the user's budgeting votes or "orders" as Decidim calls them internally.

Describe the solution you'd like
We would propose two changes to the activity feed:

  1. Add a new "visibility scope" to the activities named "private-only" (current visibilities are "public-only", "admin-only" and "all")
  2. Show the "private-only" activity log records in the activity feed that concern the given user when they are looking at the activity feed themselves

In addition to the activity feed changes, the budgeting module should store a "private-only" activity log record when the user casts a budgeting vote (or checks out a Decidim budgeting "order").

Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A

Additional context
We have done a similar customization in the budgeting pipeline module which could be used as the basis for this work but the logic would need to be changed for Decidim core because the logic is specific to the module's records.

The module stores the "private-only" activity log record for a custom record named "vote" which can contain one or multiple Decidim budgeting "orders".

Does this issue could impact on users private data?
This does not expose any extra data publicly about the user.

This only helps the user to find that they voted in PB afterwards if they later login to the platform.

Funded by
We are likely implementing this feature to a client, so we can provide this functionality to the core if agreed.

  • Filter results for category: Budgets Budgets

This proposal has been accepted and is under development

Endorsements count0
User's private activity about budgeting votes Comments 1

Reference: MDC-PROP-2021-09-16765
Version number 2 (of 2) see other versions
Check fingerprint

Fingerprint

The piece of text below is a shortened, hashed representation of this content. It's useful to ensure the content hasn't been tampered with, as a single modification would result in a totally different value.

Value: e3a2166baaac5bbc6eccbb3260877308c711cd99743c4907bc810eb3b3645e70

Source: {"body":{"en":"<p><strong>Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.</strong><br>Decidim provides a user activity timeline at /profiles/nickname/activity.</p><p>Here the service shows what the user has done within the service and the user can also see privately what they have done in private spaces.</p><p>However, in the acitivity feed there is no information about the user's budgeting votes or \"orders\" as Decidim calls them internally.</p><p><strong>Describe the solution you'd like</strong><br>We would propose two changes to the activity feed:</p><ol><li>Add a new \"visibility scope\" to the activities named \"private-only\" (current visibilities are \"public-only\", \"admin-only\" and \"all\")</li><li>Show the \"private-only\" activity log records in the activity feed that concern the given user when they are looking at the activity feed themselves</li></ol><p>In addition to the activity feed changes, the budgeting module should store a \"private-only\" activity log record when the user casts a budgeting vote (or checks out a Decidim budgeting \"order\").</p><p><strong>Describe alternatives you've considered</strong><br>N/A</p><p><strong>Additional context</strong><br>We have done a similar customization in the budgeting pipeline module which could be used as the basis for this work but the logic would need to be changed for Decidim core because the logic is specific to the module's records.</p><p>The module stores the \"private-only\" activity log record for a custom record named \"vote\" which can contain one or multiple Decidim budgeting \"orders\".</p><p><strong>Does this issue could impact on users private data?</strong><br>This does not expose any extra data publicly about the user.</p><p>This only helps the user to find that they voted in PB afterwards if they later login to the platform.</p><p><strong>Funded by</strong><br>We are likely implementing this feature to a client, so we can provide this functionality to the core if agreed.</p>"},"title":{"en":"User's private activity about budgeting votes"}}

This fingerprint is calculated using a SHA256 hashing algorithm. In order to replicate it yourself, you can use an MD5 calculator online and copy-paste the source data.

Share:

link-intact Share link

Share link:

Please paste this code in your page:

<script src="https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/16765/embed.js"></script>
<noscript><iframe src="https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/16765/embed.html" frameborder="0" scrolling="vertical"></iframe></noscript>

Report inappropriate content

Is this content inappropriate?

Reason

1 comment

Order by:
  • Older
    • Best rated
    • Recent
    • Older
    • Most discussed
Avatar: Andrés Andrés verified-badge
10/11/2021 11:02
  • Get link Get link
In favor  

Participants should have this kind of activity visible to themselves. To extend it on that, we should show:

an answered survey
supports in a budget
a comment in a private space (process or assembly)

Of these, what we show to the participant herself is the comment in a private space, but I think we should support these other cases also. I mention surveys even though is out of the scope at the moment because just a couple of days ago I have a similar discussion on https://github.com/decidim/decidim/issues/8464

Add your comment

Sign in with your account or sign up to add your comment.

Loading comments ...

  • Terms and conditions of use
  • About the community
  • Download Open Data files
  • Metadecidim at Twitter Twitter
  • Metadecidim at Instagram Instagram
  • Metadecidim at YouTube YouTube
  • Metadecidim at GitHub GitHub
Creative Commons License Website made with free software.
Decidim Logo

Confirm

OK Cancel

Please sign in

decidim Sign in with Decidim
Or

Sign up

Forgot your password?