This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about cookies.
Skip to main content
Metadecidim's official logo
  • English Triar la llengua Elegir el idioma Choose language
    • CatalĂ 
    • Castellano
Sign Up Sign In
  • Home
  • Processes
  • Assemblies
  • Initiatives
  • Consultations
  • Conferences
  • Help

Community Meetings

#CommunityMeeting Metadecidim Community work and meeting space.

  • The assembly
  • Meetings
chevron-left Back to list

Community Meeting 4: hierarchy of actions (Redesign Process)

Avatar: Official meeting Official meeting
02/03/2022 09:48   comment-square 3 comments
30 March
16:00 - 18:00
Attendees count 15
Reference: MDC-MEET-2022-03-1670
Version number 13 (of 13) see other versions

Share:

link-intact Share link

Share link:

Please paste this code in your page:

<script src="https://meta.decidim.org/assemblies/eix-comunitat/f/149/meetings/1670/embed.js"></script>
<noscript><iframe src="https://meta.decidim.org/assemblies/eix-comunitat/f/149/meetings/1670/embed.html" frameborder="0" scrolling="vertical"></iframe></noscript>

Add to calendar

  • Add to Outlook calendar
  • Add to Apple calendar
  • Add to Google calendar

After a few weeks of work we invite you to a new meeting to update you on the progress of the redesign and address another of the most reported problems regarding the usability of Decidim: the number of buttons and actions that can be active at the same time.

This often creates confusion for participants, so we are working with different hypotheses for improvement. We have opened a debate to collect feedback prior to the community meeting, so that we can share it when we meet.

In addition to discussing the hierarchy of actions, we'll also present a mockup where you will be able to see in detail how some components, the process landing and the home page look like.


Check the prototype:

đź–Ą Desktop
📱 Mobile

Structure of the meeting

1. Presentation  [ 16:00 - 16:15]

2. Group work  [ 16:15 - 17:00]

Discussions in groups of 8-5 people

3. Conclusions  [ 17:00 - 17:15]

Attending participants

Avatar: Gemma Casajuana Gemma Casajuana
Avatar: NĂşria Alonso NĂşria Alonso verified-badge
Avatar: Rober Rober
Avatar: Arnaud Brubacher Arnaud Brubacher
Avatar: Romy Grasgruber-Kerl Romy Grasgruber-Kerl
Avatar: Sitezeu Towen Gabriel Sitezeu Towen Gabriel
Avatar: Chiara Chiara
Avatar: Francesco Francesco
Avatar: Antti Hukkanen Antti Hukkanen
Avatar: Maite López Sánchez Maite López Sánchez verified-badge
Avatar: Lucien Langton Lucien Langton
Avatar: Eric RW in ABQ Eric RW in ABQ
Avatar: Ariadna Vila Ariadna Vila
Avatar: Ouarda Oubahri Ouarda Oubahri
Avatar: Pauline Bessoles Pauline Bessoles verified-badge
and 12 more people (see more) (see less)

Meeting Minutes

WORK GROUPS

2.1/  Hierarchy of actions dynamic

Discuss with all the members of the group and decide how to order the actions according to the level of importance.

2.2/ Discussion questions:

Like, endorse or fav

  • Which are your thoughts on the idea of a “like button” transversal to all components and content. For what purpose could this be useful?
  • Instead of a “like button” would you prefer a “Fav button” to add content to a favorite content list?
  • What other ideas do you have about like, endorse or fav?

Proposals navigation

  • In the prototype, we’ve seen a new navigation system for proposals. The goal is to improve the navigation between proposals without losing context. What do you think about this proposals' navigator?
  • Do you think it should be possible to support without reading the description of the proposal?
  • What other ideas do you have about proposals and other contents navigation? 


Grup 1)

Like, fav or endorse

  • It should be configurable, but it's interesting.
  • Maybe only showing the avatars that people you follow. Or show it first.
  • Antti mentions the possibility of anonimize your personal profile.

Group 2)

Like, fav or endorse

  • Endorsements are more engagers for users. What' I fond really hard in this matter is that depending on your Proposals component configuration, the actions that I want to highlight are different
  • What is the path of engagement? First you endorse and next you want to share the content. 
  • From a UX perspective there’s no clear solution. Things I would consider from a UX perspective to Position these actions:
  • How does it impact *engagement*?
  • How does it impact *adoption*?
  • How does it impact *retention*?
  • I think endorse should be thought of as "reactions" and offer a few options like Facebook.upports should remain as they function, but could benefit from a little bit of generalizations and be changed to Vote or Sign, or the option to choose the text from a few choices like that.

Proposals navigator

  • The less the better
  • We have to encourage people to read in detail the proposals before voting, but without forcing them.
  • We could subvert the design pattern used to read the T&C in apps everywhere.
  • On Decidim it would look like:
  • Browsing/comparing proposals easily in a reduced format
  • Being able to click on support from this view
  • To activate this support, having to review the whole proposal before clicking on "confirm”

Related images

cm20220330
mural001
mural002

Report inappropriate content

Is this content inappropriate?

Reason

3 comments

Order by:
  • Older
    • Best rated
    • Recent
    • Older
    • Most discussed
Comment moderated on 18/03/2022 08:16
Conversation with Maite López Sánchez
Avatar: Maite López Sánchez Maite López Sánchez verified-badge
30/03/2022 15:41
  • Get link Get link

Excuse me, but I registered and received a confirmation e-mail (with a registration code), but I do not see the link to join the meeting (I am assuming it is on-line) in the attached calendar ics. What can I do?

Avatar: Antti Hukkanen Antti Hukkanen
30/03/2022 15:57
  • Get link Get link

When you are signed in, you should see the "Join meeting" button below the description.

Avatar: Maite López Sánchez Maite López Sánchez verified-badge
30/03/2022 15:59
Edited
  • Get link Get link

Thanks! I see it now!!!

Add your comment

Sign in with your account or sign up to add your comment.

Loading comments ...

  • Terms and conditions of use
  • About the community
  • Download Open Data files
  • Metadecidim at Twitter Twitter
  • Metadecidim at Instagram Instagram
  • Metadecidim at YouTube YouTube
  • Metadecidim at GitHub GitHub
Creative Commons License Website made with free software.
Decidim Logo

Confirm

OK Cancel

Please sign in

decidim Sign in with Decidim
Or

Sign up

Forgot your password?