This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about cookies.
Skip to main content
Metadecidim's official logo
  • English Triar la llengua Elegir el idioma Choose language
    • Català
    • Castellano
Sign Up Sign In
  • Home
  • Processes
  • Assemblies
  • Initiatives
  • Consultations
  • Conferences
  • Help

Report a Bug

#BugReportDecidim Let's test Decidim and report bugs together

  • The process
  • I found a Bug!
chevron-left Back to list

Children assembly take into account on assemblies space

Avatar: Pau Parals Pau Parals verified-badge
13/07/2018 14:00  
Withdrawn

Children assembly may not display on assemblies spaces. We expected to view that children inside the assembly.

v.0.13!

  • Filter results for category: I don't know I don't know

Proposal Withdrawn Reason

We are working to solve this incidence. You can follow the status here 

Reference: MDC-PROP-2018-07-13047
Version number 1 (of 1) see other versions
Check fingerprint

Fingerprint

The piece of text below is a shortened, hashed representation of this content. It's useful to ensure the content hasn't been tampered with, as a single modification would result in a totally different value.

Value: 19ed7c40705282612b3e04b50cd6d101cad6e3a2d9695f0b50b4f836bd69ff0e

Source: {"body":{"es":"Children assembly may not display on assemblies spaces. We expected to view that children inside the assembly. \r\n\r\nv.0.13!"},"title":{"es":"Children assembly take into account on assemblies space"}}

This fingerprint is calculated using a SHA256 hashing algorithm. In order to replicate it yourself, you can use an MD5 calculator online and copy-paste the source data.

Share:

link-intact Share link

Share link:

Please paste this code in your page:

<script src="https://meta.decidim.org/processes/bug-report/f/210/proposals/13047/embed.js"></script>
<noscript><iframe src="https://meta.decidim.org/processes/bug-report/f/210/proposals/13047/embed.html" frameborder="0" scrolling="vertical"></iframe></noscript>

Related images

Bug_assemblies

Report inappropriate content

Is this content inappropriate?

Reason

7 comments

Order by:
  • Older
    • Best rated
    • Recent
    • Older
    • Most discussed
Conversation with Xabier
Avatar: Xabier Xabier verified-badge
16/07/2018 12:27
  • Get link Get link

Hi @pau_coditramuntana can you explain better what do you expect should happen. I don't fully understand your bug report. Thanks!

Avatar: Pau Parals Pau Parals verified-badge
16/07/2018 12:41
  • Get link Get link

When you are in assembly modul, you should see the whole active assemblies. But children assembly isn't an active assembly, is part of that. Same with process. If you have a group of process is because there's a one big process active and it childs takes part of it.

So imagine and organitzation that has its General Boarding. And then, created 10 child-assembly comissions inside the Assembly. It will be awfull and messy.

I think in previous versions participatory process worked like that

Avatar: Xabier Xabier verified-badge
18/07/2018 15:09
  • Get link Get link

Ok, I understand now. I think we should consider this more carefully. Right now redundancy is better than hiding information, I mean, it is better to display "unnecessary" information than not displaying information. When you say: "So imagine and organitzation that has its General Boarding. And then, created 10 child-assembly commissions inside the Assembly. It will be awfull and messy. " I don't know why this would be awful and messy. It is often at the level of commissions that most activity takes place, this is actually true of most Assemblies. As a participant I might be more interested on directly accessing the child-assembly than the mother. Children assemblies ARE active assemblies.

I suggest to hold on this proposal and see how Assemblies are used (we don't have much experience with it yet, none with child-assemblies!) and consider making changes after we have some experience. What do you think @pau_coditramuntana ?

Avatar: Pau Parals Pau Parals verified-badge
18/07/2018 15:23
  • Get link Get link

I think that we have differents points of view.

If I were a new user, I would like organized information (which not means hide information) rather than redudancy.

As you said, children assemblies are actives assemblies, but what happend if we close mother's one? In my opinion, it's mother assembly which give the children assembly active estatuts.

Maybe that's not a bug. So may I discard?

Avatar: Xabier Xabier verified-badge
03/08/2018 13:25
  • Get link Get link

Hi @paarals I reply to myself because we have reached the limit of nested comments.

I understand what you are saying, and it makes a lot of sense. But consider that in many occasions it will be the case that there only on parent Assembly and all the rest might be children.

Should we not wait to see how this is deployed and then change the way in which assemblies are displayed?

Avatar: Pau Parals Pau Parals verified-badge
03/08/2018 13:41
  • Get link Get link

I agree! So i'm gonna withdraw

Avatar: Xabier Xabier verified-badge
04/08/2018 16:18
  • Get link Get link

We can come back to this when we have more experience with how Assemblies are used

Add your comment

Sign in with your account or sign up to add your comment.

Loading comments ...

  • Terms and conditions of use
  • About the community
  • Download Open Data files
  • Metadecidim at Twitter Twitter
  • Metadecidim at Instagram Instagram
  • Metadecidim at YouTube YouTube
  • Metadecidim at GitHub GitHub
Creative Commons License Website made with free software.
Decidim Logo

Confirm

OK Cancel

Please sign in

decidim Sign in with Decidim
Or

Sign up

Forgot your password?