Aquest lloc web fa servir cookies pròpies i de tercers per millorar l’experiència de navegació, i oferir continguts i serveis d’interès. En continuar la navegació entenem que acceptes la nostra política de cookies. Per a més informació consulta aquí.
Vés al contingut principal
Logo oficial de Metadecidim
  • Català Triar la llengua Elegir el idioma Choose language
    • Castellano
    • English
Registra't Entra
  • Inici
  • Processos
  • Assemblees
  • Iniciatives
  • Consultes
  • Jornades
  • Ajuda

Proposa noves funcionalitats

#DecidimRoadmap Dissenyant el Decidim entre totes

Fase 1 de 1
Obert 01-01-2019 - 31-12-2030
Veure les fases Envia una proposta
  • El procés
  • Debats
  • Proposa noves funcionalitats
  • Novetats
chevron-left Torna al llistat

Proposals - Improve address field user experience

Avatar: Antti Hukkanen Antti Hukkanen
14/09/2018 17:19  
Finalitzada

We have received feedback that the address field is confusing. Users assume they can just enter the address, without giving the city as this instance of Decidim only concerns one city.

After they have entered an address, the points have been mapped e.g. to USA and Russia on the map as those are apparently the first results found from the geolocation service.

We should be able to configure a default city for the proposals component to fix this. This would allow the users to enter the street or location name and it would be automatically mapped to the correct city.

Another way to improve the user experience for the address selection would be to implement something similar what is available in Google Maps Platform (autocomplete feature):
https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/javascript/examples/places-autocomplete-addressform

Even with the autocomplete, I would see it beneficial if the geolocation queries could be restricted only to a specific city.

  • Resultats al filtrar per la categoria: Propostes Propostes

El desenvolupament d'aquesta proposta ha finalitzat

  • Reviewed by @product and included in Decidim Roadmap
  • It is funded by Mainio Tech
  • Developed by Mainio Tech
  • Available in release 0.23 via #6340

Llistat d'adhesions

Avatar: City of Helsinki City of Helsinki
Avatar: Virgile Deville Virgile Deville
Avatar: Armand Armand
Avatar: Carol Romero Carol Romero verified-badge
Avatar: Valentin Chaput Valentin Chaput
Avatar: Pauline Bessoles Pauline Bessoles verified-badge
i 3 persones més (veure més) (veure menys)
Número d'adhesions6
Proposals - Improve address field user experience Comentaris 13

Referència: MDC-PROP-2018-09-13156
Versió 4 (de 4) veure altres versions
Verifica l'empremta digital

Empremta digital

El text següent és una representació abreviada i hashejada d'aquest contingut. És útil per garantir que el contingut no hagi estat alterat, ja que una única modificació provocaria un valor totalment diferent.

Valor: 1d97de1d9d1e665a0fc6d62c70aef84008d3ad9a8e31e460f61fc062faace4c1

Origen: {"body":{"en":"We have received feedback that the address field is confusing. Users assume they can just enter the address, without giving the city as this instance of Decidim only concerns one city.\r\n\r\nAfter they have entered an address, the points have been mapped e.g. to USA and Russia on the map as those are apparently the first results found from the geolocation service.\r\n\r\nWe should be able to configure a default city for the proposals component to fix this. This would allow the users to enter the street or location name and it would be automatically mapped to the correct city.\r\n\r\nAnother way to improve the user experience for the address selection would be to implement something similar what is available in Google Maps Platform (autocomplete feature):\r\nhttps://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/javascript/examples/places-autocomplete-addressform\r\n\r\nEven with the autocomplete, I would see it beneficial if the geolocation queries could be restricted only to a specific city."},"title":{"en":"Proposals - Improve address field user experience"}}

Aquesta empremta digital es calcula mitjançant un algoritme de hash SHA256. Per reproduir-lo tu mateix, pots utilitzar una Calculadora MD5 en línia i copiar-hi les dades d'origen.

Compartir:

link-intact Compartir l'enllaç

Compartir l'enllaç:

Si us plau, enganxa aquest codi a la teva pàgina:

<script src="https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/13156/embed.js?locale=ca"></script>
<noscript><iframe src="https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/13156/embed.html?locale=ca" frameborder="0" scrolling="vertical"></iframe></noscript>

Reportar contingut inapropiat

Aquest contingut no és apropiat?

Motiu

13 comentaris

Ordenar per:
  • Més antic
    • Més ben valorats
    • Recent
    • Més antic
    • Més discutit
Conversa amb Armand
Avatar: Armand Armand
02/10/2018 15:25
  • Obtenir enllaç Obtenir enllaç

The autocomplete feature has a real added value for users. You will never know when your users want to mark something in this or this city.

Avatar: Carol Romero Carol Romero verified-badge
16/04/2020 17:05
  • Obtenir enllaç Obtenir enllaç

Agreed with Armand. I think the autocomplete would be an optimal solution.

Avatar: Virgile Deville Virgile Deville
29/04/2020 10:58
  • Obtenir enllaç Obtenir enllaç

We are working on this :
- autocomplete
- restricting geocoding to a certain area (to avoid being pinned in Russia, Brazil for a local consultation)

@carol I understood recently that the pin displayed on the map above are only the ones from the proposal list displayed bellow which is very confusing. One would like to have all the proposal pinned on the map. What do you think ?

Avatar: Carol Romero Carol Romero verified-badge
29/04/2020 12:32
  • Obtenir enllaç Obtenir enllaç

we're also working on the autocomplete! we just created the issue a few days ago: https://github.com/decidim/decidim/issues/6024

One would like to have all the proposal pinned on the map

What do you mean with all the proposals? We're talking about the map in the context of a specific participation space, right?

Avatar: Antti Hukkanen Antti Hukkanen
30/04/2020 09:42
  • Obtenir enllaç Obtenir enllaç

@Virgile Deville have you thought further how you're gonna implement the geocoding to certain area?

I think the best option would be to use the "bounding box" parameter available e.g. with Here. There may be service specific differences regarding this (as there is also the other discussion to change Here to something better).

https://developer.here.com/documentation/geocoder/dev_guide/topics/resource-type-bounding-box.html
Change "here.com" for "Open Street Map"

So far we have implemented it simply just by customizing the geocoding validator and adding a suffix to the geocoding queries such as "{query}, Town, Country". It works better but we've noticed this also causes some of the results to be misinterpreted by the geocoder. E.g. someone had put an area name of a city in South Finland and it was geocoded to Lapland, even when the are name was correctly written and the area exists in that city.

Conversa amb Virgile Deville
Avatar: Virgile Deville Virgile Deville
29/04/2020 14:53
  • Obtenir enllaç Obtenir enllaç

Just the proposals from the component but all of them.
Currently only a few are being shown as pins on the maps.
Here is an image to be more clear.
https://imgur.com/aW1n0Z5

Avatar: Virgile Deville Virgile Deville
29/04/2020 14:54
  • Obtenir enllaç Obtenir enllaç

@carol

Avatar: Carol Romero Carol Romero verified-badge
29/04/2020 14:59
  • Obtenir enllaç Obtenir enllaç

Oh yes, you're right! I should see al the proposals regardless of the first page (this reinforces my thesis that we should tend to have a triple view of components such as proposals or meetings: list, cards and map). Let's see if I can find the time to make a proposal detailing this.

Avatar: Virgile Deville Virgile Deville
19/11/2020 16:26
  • Obtenir enllaç Obtenir enllaç

this reinforces my thesis that we should tend to have a triple view of components such as proposals or meetings: list, cards and map

@carol resurfaced this today while doing QA. Super interesting idea. Happy to work with you on this.

Avatar: Carol Romero Carol Romero verified-badge
23/11/2020 18:53
  • Obtenir enllaç Obtenir enllaç

Yay! Let's think how to do it!

Conversa amb Virgile Deville
Avatar: Virgile Deville Virgile Deville
01/07/2020 14:24
  • Obtenir enllaç Obtenir enllaç

Hello @carol can you share some updates on this ?
Please link PR if there are any :)

Avatar: Virgile Deville Virgile Deville
01/07/2020 14:37
  • Obtenir enllaç Obtenir enllaç

@carol also we did a feature that limits the geocoding area to a country if you are interested https://github.com/OpenSourcePolitics/decidim/pull/951

Avatar: Antti Hukkanen Antti Hukkanen
24/11/2020 11:26
  • Obtenir enllaç Obtenir enllaç

This would be really cool to have but not only for the country, also to limit the city e.g. with the bounding box search. I believe most geocoders allow restricting the search with a bounding box (e.g. city's bounding coordinates).

This would allow getting rid of the matching results in other cities.

Deixa el teu comentari

Inicia la sessió amb el teu compte o registra't per afegir el teu comentari.

Carregant els comentaris ...

  • Termes i condicions d'ús
  • Sobre la comunitat
  • Descarrega els fitxers de dades obertes
  • Metadecidim a Twitter Twitter
  • Metadecidim a Instagram Instagram
  • Metadecidim a YouTube YouTube
  • Metadecidim a GitHub GitHub
Amb llicència Creative Commons Web creada amb programari lliure.
Logo Decidim

Confirmar

D'acord Cancel·lar

Si us plau, inicia sessió

decidim Inicia sessió amb Decidim
O

Registra't

Has oblidat la teva contrasenya?