Aquest lloc web fa servir cookies pròpies i de tercers per millorar l’experiència de navegació, i oferir continguts i serveis d’interès. En continuar la navegació entenem que acceptes la nostra política de cookies. Per a més informació consulta aquí.
Vés al contingut principal
Logo oficial de Metadecidim
  • Català Triar la llengua Elegir el idioma Choose language
    • Castellano
    • English
Registra't Entra
  • Inici
  • Processos
  • Assemblees
  • Iniciatives
  • Consultes
  • Jornades
  • Ajuda

Proposa noves funcionalitats

#DecidimRoadmap Dissenyant el Decidim entre totes

Fase 1 de 1
Obert 01-01-2019 - 31-12-2030
Veure les fases Envia una proposta
  • El procés
  • Debats
  • Proposa noves funcionalitats
  • Novetats
chevron-left Torna al llistat

Proposal creation UX - Changes to stepped proposal creation

Avatar: Antti Hukkanen Antti Hukkanen
20/09/2018 13:34  

The stepping functionality is great for use cases where you can have a large amount of proposals and want to make it easier for

We have received feedback from the users that it makes the proposal creation process more complicated and the comparison step is not clear for all users. Also, some testers have complained that in case the comparison phase is omitted, it is confusing that the stepper jumps one phase and they have to submit the "same" form again.

We propose:
- Remove the stepper indicator from the sidebar
- Show all fields but the attachment already in the first step
- Only show comparison if it is necessary
- In the final phase, only ask for the attachment
- Make stepping (and previewing) configurable as they are not needed in all cases.

  • Resultats al filtrar per la categoria: Propostes Propostes

Llistat d'adhesions

Avatar: Virgile Deville Virgile Deville
Avatar: Valentin Chaput Valentin Chaput
Número d'adhesions2
Proposal creation UX - Changes to stepped proposal creation Comentaris 5

Referència: MDC-PROP-2018-09-13175
Versió 2 (de 2) veure altres versions
Verifica l'empremta digital

Empremta digital

El text següent és una representació abreviada i hashejada d'aquest contingut. És útil per garantir que el contingut no hagi estat alterat, ja que una única modificació provocaria un valor totalment diferent.

Valor: 8d901b6089e805dc68c51855b611e2b82d50678e85ab3c0bb17eb7b2d3eeac47

Origen: {"body":{"en":"The stepping functionality is great for use cases where you can have a large amount of proposals and want to make it easier for \r\n\r\nWe have received feedback from the users that it makes the proposal creation process more complicated and the comparison step is not clear for all users. Also, some testers have complained that in case the comparison phase is omitted, it is confusing that the stepper jumps one phase and they have to submit the \"same\" form again.\r\n\r\nWe propose:\r\n- Remove the stepper indicator from the sidebar\r\n- Show all fields but the attachment already in the first step\r\n- Only show comparison if it is necessary\r\n- In the final phase, only ask for the attachment\r\n- Make stepping (and previewing) configurable as they are not needed in all cases."},"title":{"en":"Proposal creation UX - Changes to stepped proposal creation"}}

Aquesta empremta digital es calcula mitjançant un algoritme de hash SHA256. Per reproduir-lo tu mateix, pots utilitzar una Calculadora MD5 en línia i copiar-hi les dades d'origen.

Compartir:

link-intact Compartir l'enllaç

Compartir l'enllaç:

Si us plau, enganxa aquest codi a la teva pàgina:

<script src="https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/13175/embed.js?locale=ca"></script>
<noscript><iframe src="https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/13175/embed.html?locale=ca" frameborder="0" scrolling="vertical"></iframe></noscript>

Reportar contingut inapropiat

Aquest contingut no és apropiat?

Motiu

5 comentaris

Ordenar per:
  • Més antic
    • Més ben valorats
    • Recent
    • Més antic
    • Més discutit
Conversa amb Carol Romero
Avatar: Carol Romero Carol Romero verified-badge
20/09/2018 13:51
  • Obtenir enllaç Obtenir enllaç

Hi @ahu, thank you for the proposal. I agree that the current wizard has some room for improvement. Anyways, I'm curious, are you guys doing user tests with the platform?

Avatar: Antti Hukkanen Antti Hukkanen
20/09/2018 14:00
  • Obtenir enllaç Obtenir enllaç

They are internally testing it at Helsinki, asking basically different people for comments within the organization. Quite many of these proposals I've added are based on that feedback which @katjah has forwarded to me.

@katjah may have more information on how this has been carried out in action. I would assume it's just feedback from users that keeps pouring in as more and more people are testing it out. The end goal is to have the system more understandable and simple to use when they take it to wider use.

Also, we have another ongoing project for a new Decidim instance and there few UX designers and experts went through the functionality of the system and also gave some feedback. One of the points in the proposal actually originates from their comments regarding skipping the step.

Avatar: Katja Henttonen Katja Henttonen
20/09/2018 14:25
  • Obtenir enllaç Obtenir enllaç

This is not random feedback but we are indeed running some formal user testing now, with focus on the proposal component. These have been in-person tests, group sizes ranging from 3 to 20. Based on these, we are quite worried on the usability of the platform. Despite most testers being city employees and therefore relatively computer literate, several people have failed to leave a proposal - and many others get very frustrated before doing so. We are about to acquire a senior usability expert to analyze the problem and come up with some suggestions how to improve the usability of the proposal step. I will let you know how it goes. :)

Avatar: Virgile Deville Virgile Deville
20/09/2018 22:02
  • Obtenir enllaç Obtenir enllaç

Those UX improvements make a lot of sense to me. Was making myself similar remarks the other day.

Avatar: Antti Hukkanen Antti Hukkanen
03/04/2020 14:19
  • Obtenir enllaç Obtenir enllaç

These same issues keep pouring in from people who test Decidim for the first time.

Helsinki is a bit of a special case in these terms because the proposal feature has been modified for them (to make it simpler by skipping all the other steps than "complete"). I believe this is what most other users would want to see as well.

I still believe stepping is valuable but not in the way it has been now implemented. In the "complete" phase the title and body fields should not be visible anymore because the user already filled those. "Why are you showing me the same fields I just filled?". This is even more confusing when the comparison step is skipped.

The compare step also does not really work for the Finnish language. It's more of an irritation factor than anything valuable + the current implementation would require quite a lot to make it usable and accessible even if it was valuable for someone. If it was configurable, I think 100% of our customers would decide not to use it.

Deixa el teu comentari

Inicia la sessió amb el teu compte o registra't per afegir el teu comentari.

Carregant els comentaris ...

  • Termes i condicions d'ús
  • Sobre la comunitat
  • Descarrega els fitxers de dades obertes
  • Metadecidim a Twitter Twitter
  • Metadecidim a Instagram Instagram
  • Metadecidim a YouTube YouTube
  • Metadecidim a GitHub GitHub
Amb llicència Creative Commons Web creada amb programari lliure.
Logo Decidim

Confirmar

D'acord Cancel·lar

Si us plau, inicia sessió

decidim Inicia sessió amb Decidim
O

Registra't

Has oblidat la teva contrasenya?