Propose new features
Designing Decidim together
Rejected
Most large institutions require using paper ballots for participatory budgeting. We need a smart way to account for them.
Best is to account for them in a seperate way, probably via the admin interface or using a csv import.
This proposal has been rejected because:
Decidim's premise is to hybridize face-to-face and digital participation to ensure that it is as inclusive as possible. However, the use of paper combined with the digital layer presents a number of security and process integrity issues. Our recommendation is that in-person voting be done with digital supports.
This proposal is not accepted in the main project, although it can be developed as a module.
Report inappropriate content
Is this content inappropriate?
Comment details
You are seeing a single comment
View all comments
I agree, we’re also using Decidim when it fits best, it’s just too hard to tell a small city district that the platform they’ll be using can’t import their votes when 80% vote on paper, especially when they don’t benefit from the advantages of Decidim such as modularity, multitenant.
Let’s hope that this gets developed. I could have a try but I would honestly not trust myself regarding the design of the feature.
Loading comments ...