Propose new functionalities for Decidim software

I think many comments refer to the internal regulations (https://meta.decidim.org/processes/decidim-gov/f/996/), the code of ethics, and the certification process for companies, and I don't think we should discuss it in a proposal within this process.

According to the roadmap, before October we should have been able to trace it. https://metadecidim.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/decidim/attachment/file/2095/FULLDERUTACOMIT%C3%88DE_COORDINACI%C3%93.pdf

Now that it seems that Saturday will clear up the panorama in Barceona, it may be a good time to reactivate the governance process (https://meta.decidim.org/processes/decidim-gov/)

I think that the current explanation (the one updated today) is not enough. There's still the uncertainty when a proposal will be accepted. For example, this spring we've proposed to implement a "Department admin" role feature, I think this feature is in accordance with the social contract, but was refused without further discussion.

As it is explained in the process page all proposals that accomplish with the social contract should be accepted, independently on the number of adhesions. I think it is not good to accept every proposal that accomplish the social contract, we have the risk to convert Decidim into a Frankenstein. But also think that the protocol on how proposals are accepted should be more predictable.

Some kind of debate around this will be great :D

Thanks @oliver_valls, I completely agree with you. For the ones working on the code every day we have the need to eliminate uncertainty. And I'm not sure if we should delay much this discussion and set up, at least some provisional rules to follow. This will contribute to the developers happiness, which is quite important on a opensource project.