Propose new functionalities for Decidim software
#DecidimRoadmap Designing Decidim together
Finished
Here is a list of small improvements that we are planning to make on Decidim's master :
- Enable global scope selection and signature threshold
- Admin option to disable promoting committee
- Simplify initiative creation wizard when there is only one option available (1 type of initiative, 1 type of signature collection, only global scope signature threshold)
Related Github issue here : https://github.com/OpenSourcePolitics/dev/issues/5
The development of this proposal has finished
- Has been reviewed by Decidim Product and complies with the Social Contract
- It is funded by Senate (France)
- Developed by Open Source Politics
- Available in release 0.20 via #5369
Report inappropriate content
Is this content inappropriate?
7 comments
Conversation with Pau Parals
Hi @virgile_deville, the features you propose look good! The only thing I don't understand is the global scope. What do you mean? Currently, an initiative with a global scope (eg = city) can be done, no?
The global scope is not one you create it's there by default which means all of your territory I guess. @paarals check out the issue on github for further reference.
ah ok! But I think, it just means that you need a "global scope" that you have to configure in the Administration Panel. It seems to me that this "global scope" by default doesn't work on the rest of the platform.
Yeah I see what you mean. From a UX perspective it's frustrating to have to select an entry when there is only one value available. So maybe that's the feature, if there is only one value possible then it's preselected ?
Another possibility is being able to create signature threshold for a type of initiative that are not associated with any scope. Then it would be like a participatory process you need to activate the scopes for an initiative type.
What do you think @arnau ?
Hey @paarals I thought about this.
Maybe the better way to do this is to be able to create threshold without associating it to a scope.
Conversation with Virgile Deville
@arnau we will start development on this as of next week could you give us some kind of feedback if the Product Team is likely to accept this ?
All of the improvements proposed looks great to me, and it is compatible with the existing use cases. Thanks for the contribution @virgile_deville
Add your comment
Sign in with your account or sign up to add your comment.
Loading comments ...