Aquest lloc web fa servir cookies pròpies i de tercers per millorar l’experiència de navegació, i oferir continguts i serveis d’interès. En continuar la navegació entenem que acceptes la nostra política de cookies. Per a més informació consulta aquí.
Vés al contingut principal
Logo oficial de Metadecidim
  • Català Triar la llengua Elegir el idioma Choose language
    • Castellano
    • English
Registra't Entra
  • Inici
  • Processos
  • Assemblees
  • Iniciatives
  • Consultes
  • Jornades
  • Ajuda

Proposa noves funcionalitats

#DecidimRoadmap Dissenyant el Decidim entre totes

Fase 1 de 1
Obert 01-01-2019 - 31-12-2030
Veure les fases Envia una proposta
  • El procés
  • Debats
  • Proposa noves funcionalitats
  • Novetats
chevron-left Torna al llistat

Individual contexts and scopes

Avatar: Robert Visser Robert Visser
18/10/2019 17:21  

Individual interest, engagement and legitimate participation is dependent on individual context and scope. Let me explain this with some practical examples:

As a home-owner one might wish to participate in decision making about the maintainance of the collective entrance or roofing of its dependent apartments. As a street dweller one might wish to participate in decision making on the public lightning, detailing of public green spaces, etc of one's own street. As a neighbourood inhabitant one might want to participate in decision making about the neighbourhood events and festivities, local car parking policy etc. Thus particular subjects are relevant to individuals within several nested scopes of organisation arount their own personal situation.
An individual also appears to play roles within multiple participative contexts. For example as a parent of a school-going child, one might like to ligitimately participate in several layers of decisionmaking on the happenings in a particular schoolclass / schoolyear / schoolbuiling / educative organisation. Participate as a member of a sports team / sports association / sports federation; as member of a religious community; as an employee of a professional organisation and possibly as trade union member; as a member of a political party; etc. So legitimate participation seems dependent on the context where someone has a particular participative identity and organisational scope.

Decidim started out as a platform buildt for participative processes in municipal govenment. It's interface has been buildt mainly from this organisational perspective. Participation from a citizens perspective has organisational plurality. A citizen can't actively participate in all organisational contexts and scopes and needs to devide its attention to subjects according to personal importance, responsability, competence, etc. A federated form of Decidim might possibly become more user centric and assist citizens in the selection of the participative proceses one wishes to engage in.
Could Decidim be structured and designed in a way where it would be possible for citizens to ultimately have information and opportunities for participation presented dependant on their (selected and approved) inclusion in several personal contexts, tenants and instances?

My proposal would be to discuss the desirablility and technical feasability of permitting users of a (possibly both multitenant and federated) decidim platform to be organised into multiple citizen centred contexts and scopes.

  • Resultats al filtrar per la categoria: Sistemes de classificació de continguts Sistemes de classificació de continguts
Número d'adhesions0
Individual contexts and scopes Comentaris 0

Referència: MDC-PROP-2019-10-14864
Versió 1 (de 1) veure altres versions
Verifica l'empremta digital

Empremta digital

El text següent és una representació abreviada i hashejada d'aquest contingut. És útil per garantir que el contingut no hagi estat alterat, ja que una única modificació provocaria un valor totalment diferent.

Valor: 07334c81d1167ff439c97cca0fb86579db553f32e567677ad111bc475195e13b

Origen: {"body":{"en":"Individual interest, engagement and legitimate participation is dependent on individual context and scope. Let me explain this with some practical examples:\r\n\r\nAs a home-owner one might wish to participate in decision making about the maintainance of the collective entrance or roofing of its dependent apartments. As a street dweller one might wish to participate in decision making on the public lightning, detailing of public green spaces, etc of one's own street. As a neighbourood inhabitant one might want to participate in decision making about the neighbourhood events and festivities, local car parking policy etc. Thus particular subjects are relevant to individuals within several nested scopes of organisation arount their own personal situation. \r\nAn individual also appears to play roles within multiple participative contexts. For example as a parent of a school-going child, one might like to ligitimately participate in several layers of decisionmaking on the happenings in a particular schoolclass / schoolyear / schoolbuiling / educative organisation. Participate as a member of a sports team / sports association / sports federation; as member of a religious community; as an employee of a professional organisation and possibly as trade union member; as a member of a political party; etc. So legitimate participation seems dependent on the context where someone has a particular participative identity and organisational scope.\r\n\r\nDecidim started out as a platform buildt for participative processes in municipal govenment. It's interface has been buildt mainly from this organisational perspective. Participation from a citizens perspective has organisational plurality. A citizen can't actively participate in all organisational contexts and scopes and needs to devide its attention to subjects according to personal importance, responsability, competence, etc. A federated form of Decidim might possibly become more user centric and assist citizens in the selection of the participative proceses one wishes to engage in. \r\nCould Decidim be structured and designed in a way where it would be possible for citizens to ultimately have information and opportunities for participation presented dependant on their (selected and approved) inclusion in several personal contexts, tenants and instances?\r\n\r\nMy proposal would be to discuss the desirablility and technical feasability of permitting users of a (possibly both multitenant and federated) decidim platform to be organised into multiple citizen centred contexts and scopes."},"title":{"en":"Individual contexts and scopes"}}

Aquesta empremta digital es calcula mitjançant un algoritme de hash SHA256. Per reproduir-lo tu mateix, pots utilitzar una Calculadora MD5 en línia i copiar-hi les dades d'origen.

Compartir:

link-intact Compartir l'enllaç

Compartir l'enllaç:

Si us plau, enganxa aquest codi a la teva pàgina:

<script src="https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/14864/embed.js?locale=ca"></script>
<noscript><iframe src="https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/14864/embed.html?locale=ca" frameborder="0" scrolling="vertical"></iframe></noscript>

Reportar contingut inapropiat

Aquest contingut no és apropiat?

Motiu

0 comentaris

Ordenar per:
  • Més antic
    • Més ben valorats
    • Recent
    • Més antic
    • Més discutit

Deixa el teu comentari

Inicia la sessió amb el teu compte o registra't per afegir el teu comentari.

Carregant els comentaris ...

  • Termes i condicions d'ús
  • Sobre la comunitat
  • Descarrega els fitxers de dades obertes
  • Metadecidim a Twitter Twitter
  • Metadecidim a Instagram Instagram
  • Metadecidim a YouTube YouTube
  • Metadecidim a GitHub GitHub
Amb llicència Creative Commons Web creada amb programari lliure.
Logo Decidim

Confirmar

D'acord Cancel·lar

Si us plau, inicia sessió

decidim Inicia sessió amb Decidim
O

Registra't

Has oblidat la teva contrasenya?