This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about cookies.

Propose new functionalities for Decidim software

#DecidimRoadmap Designing Decidim together

Phase 1 of 1
Open 2019-01-01 - 2030-12-31
Process phases Submit a proposal
Back to list

Add a "Return" button in the FO to get back to indexes

Avatar: Pauline Bessoles Pauline Bessoles
25/11/2019 16:30  
Finished

As a user, when clicking on a card on the Index, I want to be able to return to the list of cards (index) easily.

This button should be available on the cards of :
- Proposals
- Results (accountability component)
- News
- Meetings
- Sortitions
- Debates

The development of this proposal has finished

  • Reviewed by @product and included in Decidim Roadmap
  • It is funded by Open Source Politics
  • Developed by Open Source Politics 
  • Available in release 0.21 via #5591

List of Endorsements

Avatar: Virgile Deville Virgile Deville
Avatar: Oliver Valls Oliver Valls
Avatar: vincent vincent
Avatar: roxu roxu
and 1 more person (see more) (see less)
Endorsements count4
Add a "Return" button in the FO to get back to indexes Comments 13

Reference: MDC-PROP-2019-11-14938
Version number 3 (of 3) see other versions
Check fingerprint

Share link:

Please paste this code in your page:

<script src="https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/14938/embed.js"></script>
<noscript><iframe src="https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/14938/embed.html" frameborder="0" scrolling="vertical"></iframe></noscript>

Related images

Return button

Comment details

Order by:
You are seeing a single comment

View all comments

Conversation with Carol Romero
Avatar: Carol Romero Carol Romero

Hey, guys, sorry I couldn't answer before. Regarding what you're saying @virgile_deville, I think that would be solved by changing the name of the menu items. If instead of "propose new features" you use "proposals", the breadcrumb would be: Home > Processes > Propose new features > Proposals. I'd say that this leaves little room for confusion, whether you come from outside or inside.

Since we didn't have a call to action from the process header before, in this process we used the menu item as a CTA, but actually it would be more appropriate to use "proposals" or "features", just as we have "debates" or "meetings".

Avatar: Carol Romero Carol Romero

Having said that, I fully understand that this may exceed the scope of this proposal. But I sincerely think that this would be a better solution because it improves the whole navigation system on the platform and not for a specific case of returning to an index.
And since this is not a question of faith either 😜, it would be good to be able to do some tests with participants. We are thinking about developing self-testing kits with a researcher in user experience, so that we can make some decisions based on data.

Avatar: Virgile Deville Virgile Deville

Hi @carol thanks for the reply.
I rest my case though "Return to index" is a user story in itself.
Until a breadcrump is implemented would you accept our PR for the return button ?

Avatar: Carol Romero Carol Romero

Well, if you're asking me :D it is true that without being the optimal solution, it partially solves the problem, so I'd say yes to PR, and in the medium term let's address the implementation of breadcrumbs in a homogeneous way throughout the platform, including the accountability module.

However, please take as a reference the same style that we are already using in participatory texts, here is an example: Article 2. Finalitat
(I'll confirm you tomorrow after the product meeting)

Loading comments ...