Propose new functionalities for Decidim software
#DecidimRoadmap Designing Decidim together
Is your feature request related to a problem? A clear and concise description of what the problem is.
Author = the user that created the initiative in the first place
Member = user that was accepted as a member in the promoter committee
Currently members have the same permissions as the author of the initiative. A member can send the initiative to technical validation (without a way to cancel) remove and accept other members. This creates a high level of uncertaintety around the process of drafting an initiatives. We added versioning so we can at least track changes made by everyone.
Here is an exhaustive permission table for members and authors : https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11473995/101887291-f073f400-3b9c-11eb-8c74-e01925d55bf2.png
Describe the solution you'd like
We think that distinguishing the permissions of the initial author and the co-author would help solve this issue.
Here's the updated permission table that we propose implementing :
Describe alternatives you've considered
None
Does this issue could impact on users private data?
No
Funded by
National Assembly and OSP
Report inappropriate content
Is this content inappropriate?
Comment details
You are seeing a single comment
You can check the rest of the comments here.
Conversation with Virgile Deville
As an admin I can perform all the actions of a promoter's committee member. I think there wouldn't be any impact on @josanFFiG usage.
Can we get a feedback on this soon as we'll need to get started with the development as soon as next week ...
Thanks in advance !
@virgile_deville I think @josanFFiG 's main doubt with this is that, being and admin, he often comes on board as a *temporary* committee member to help the promoters.
I was kind of confused by that because the admin can do everything a promoter's committee member can do. So from what I understand there's no need for the admin to join in order to be able to help.
Loading comments ...