This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about it here.
#BeaMember - A new form of commitment to Decidim
Decidim

Last activity

Type
Results per page:
  • 30/04/2020 12:36
  • New proposal at Propose new functionalities for Decidim software
    Disable email signup and signin
    **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** We have an upcoming project where the client requires that we disable email signup/signin in Decidim. Only OAuth strategies will be available.**Describe the solution you'd like** We'll add a new setting in the organization to enable/disable email signin/signups. It will be enabled by default, and we'll add a text explaining the importance.This change implies hiding any email and password fields in the user account page.**Describe alternatives you've considered** Monkey-patch the code from the app side, but this would increase maintenance costs and would prevent other isntallations to use this feature.**Does this issue could impact on users private data?** It's related with user's sign up/sign in process, but I wouldn't say it affects their private data.
  • 29/04/2020 12:43
  • New proposal at Propose new functionalities for Decidim software
    Enhance initiative filter in the admin
    **Is your feature request related to a problem? **Searching capabilities for admins are somewhat limited for initiatives. There are no filters for initiative types, few columns are sortable.**Describe the solution you'd like**I'd like to add a filter for initiative types. And make the signature column sortable.**Does this issue could impact on users private data?**No
  • 29/04/2020 12:19
  • New proposal at Propose new functionalities for Decidim software
    Add an answer date to initiative answer
    Is your feature request related to a problem?Often when an official answer is given to an initiative it is associated has official date that does with it.Describe the solution you'd likeI'd like to add a date field in the initiative answer form. The date is selected by the admin when answering it can be selected freely but cannot be in the future.Describe alternatives you've consideredAdding the date directly in the answer but this prevents me from using the answer date a sorting element for initiative in front and back office.Does this issue could impact on users private data?No
  • 29/04/2020 12:07
  • New proposal at Propose new functionalities for Decidim software
    Harmonize Initiative front office filters
    Is your feature request related to a problem?Recently front-office filters for proposals where revamped. It now allows mutlti-select thanks to checkboxes. It allows for more discoverability as you can make more precise selections that the radio button offers.Describe the solution you'd likeI'd like to revamp the filter box in that logic. I'll take this opportunity to add couple changes so that the filtering is improved :add subfilters to closed so that people can filter by status "accepted" "rejected"add a filter for initiatives that received an answerDoes this issue could impact on users private data? Ex. issues related with user's sign up/sign in process, verifications, invitations, sensitive data like email, IP addresses, etc.
  • 27/04/2020 15:35
  • New proposal at Propose new functionalities for Decidim software
    Set email asset host dynamically
    Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. It can be strange for users to find resource URLs that are linked to another organization, this development allows to either define a common asset host for all organizations (example: assets.decidim.org) or to reroute assets according to the organization's host. Describe the solution you'd like I would like to set email asset host dynamically if the application asset host is empty. Describe alternatives you've considered A workaround is to set an asset host to a neutral url like "assets.decidim.org"
  • 23/04/2020 16:18
  • New proposal at Propose new functionalities for Decidim software
    Online Meetings with videconferences
    Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.As an administrator on the last couple weeks I'm receiving lots of requests to have online meetings.Describe the solution you'd likeI would want to have an option when configuring a Meeting where I can select if the Meeting is Online or Presential. If it's Presential (default selection on admin panel) then it should work as usual (with Location/Map).If it's Online then:* It should allow me to add an URL for the videoconference or streaming service that's going to be used* It should not allow to add a Location nor try to find this location through the Geocoder * It should have an URL field validation * It should not appear on the Meetings map We should also add a "Method" filter on Meetings so they're discoverable someway. It should have two options: * Online: all the legacy meetings (already created before this new issue)* Presential: we should hide the map for these kind of meetingshttps://i.imgur.com/79GjRVt.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/Z1WgbHU.pngFor better discoverability, we must also change the "map-marker" icon on the card, it should have a "external-link" icon:https://i.imgur.com/G3f1UvK.pngOn the future it'd nice to also have an embed feature for these kind of contents (like embedding youtube streammings or jitsi videoconferences). This could be extended to other videoconfence services. Describe alternatives you've consideredAt the moment the workaround that we found is: * Add Location as "Barcelona" (as in "all the city")* Add Location Hint with the URL of the videoconf/streaming serviceAdditional contextThis is related with the isolation / COVID19 situation. Does this issue could impact on users private data?NoAcceptance criteria- [ ] As an administrator I can add a Presential Meeting (as usual)- [ ] As an administrator I can add an Online Meeting - [ ] As an administrator I can only add URLs to this field - [ ] As a visitor I have a filter to navigate Meetings by "method"
  • 22/04/2020 14:04
  • New proposal at Propose new functionalities for Decidim software
    Management the ups and downs participants of an instance
    **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** For the case of organizations it's needed the possibility to management the ups and downs of the members of an organization, Usually the membership is related to pay a share. Actually it's not possible to delete participants of an instance. We received so many claims in this sense. **Describe the solution you'd like** The possibility to delete participants of an instance from the Admin dashboard. We should discuss how this could be done and who could have the permisions to do it. Maybe could be a group of people? Maybe we could allowed the deleted participant to claim? **Describe alternatives you've considered** The private participants it's a temporary solution to this, but it's not confortable for some organizations. **Additional context** **Does this issue could impact on users private data?** Yes
  • 21/04/2020 14:51
  • New meeting at SOM Metadecidim
    SOM 18 > Practical uses of Decidim in the Covid-19 crisis
    (Watch the streaming ☝️ or listen to it on Ràdio Decidim)We invite the entire MetaDecidim community to participate in the first telematic SOM! In this SOM we will learn about new Decidim instances that have arisen around the convid-19 health crisis. Based on these experiences, we will discuss how...
  • 21/04/2020 09:59
  • New proposal at Propose new functionalities for Decidim software
    Possibility to use free text search for categories and scopes
    **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** We have received feedback from actual users that they have tried to search their proposals using the free text search by writing the category or scope they remember marking their proposal with.They have failed to find their proposals through this method. **Describe the solution you'd like** The category and scope names should be included in the free text search to make this possible. **Describe alternatives you've considered** Instructing the users is always a possibility but it would greatly help users if they are provided with the tools they expect to work and they are used to using other services online, such as Google or Facebook.**Additional context** **Does this issue could impact on users private data?** No.
  • 16/04/2020 11:26
  • New proposal at Propose new functionalities for Decidim software
    Allow the admin to enable/disable a contact button on card & show of proposals
    Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.In this containment period, help & support networks are multiplying on Decidim. Some of our clients are creating assemblies or PP for citizens to offer or ask help. In this peculiar case, it can be hard for users to find how to contact other users (offering or asking for help) via Decidim messaging. Describe the solution you'd like As an admin, when configuring the proposal component, I want to be able to enable/disable the display of the envelope icon on proposal pages of the component. As a user, when reading a proposal page, I want to be able to contact directly the author by clicking on an envelope icon. Describe alternatives you've consideredNone Additional context See linked mockup Does this issue could impact on users private data? No
  • 16/04/2020 10:12
  • New proposal at Propose new functionalities for Decidim software
    Multilingual URLs for language versions
    **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** Currently the different language versions are indicated using a URL parameter, e.g. "?locale=fi". This is not optimal for:The user, they generally do not understand what these are and they may remove the relevant information from the URL when they copy-paste it somewhereGoogle, as they say different URLs should be used for different langauge versions: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/182192?hl=enMarketing, e.g. when you write the service URL to a marketing banner, e.g. "Participate now at meta.decidim.org/es" looks much nicer than "Participate now at meta.decidim.org?locale=es".We have been also requested that each section could also have different URL names, e.g. "meta.decidim.org/processes" would be "meta.decidim.org/fi/prosessit" in the Finnish version. Some accessibility experts claim that this is even required for accessible services. Pretty standard feature in many CMS systems but this is is completely another problem that boils down to the overall improvement of the CMS features in Decidim:Allow defining static page content using the content blocksAllow adding multiple same type of content blocks on pagePossibility to configure the top level navigationPossibility to configure the participatory space navigationAdding icons to pages and topics**Describe the solution you'd like** The primary (default) language URLs should be intact as they are now.The secondary languages should be indicated with a sub-path in the URL, such as "meta.decidim.org/es/...".Implementing this also requires adding 301 redirections to the old parameter URLs, so that old Google results, social media shares and document links will still point to the correct location. **Describe alternatives you've considered** There are really no alternatives as the suggested is the accepted common "standard" / convention for defining language versions in public web. Common conventions should be followed as that makes the overall experience better for everyone, people and machines. This will also bump the site's SEO relevance.You can of course add redirections manually for the sub-path URLs simply for marketing purposes but this seems clunky and it's not the right way to go. **Additional context** The URL parameter convention may be acceptable for services which are not facing the public web, i.e. they require logging in from the user.However, for system such as Decidim, we should follow the commonly accepted convention for public websites as most of Decidim's content is meant to be visible in the public web.This issue applies to multiple categories (but I can only select one):UX / PX / UsabilityAccessibilitySEO / Search Engine **Does this issue could impact on users private data?** No.
  • 15/04/2020 11:31
  • New proposal at Propose new functionalities for Decidim software
    Initiatives filters enhancement BO
    Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Filter for initiatives are not complete, and could be enhanced by some improvements, in FO & BO. To prevent further improvements on initiatives filters in FO, we should implement checkboxes, as it has been developed for proposals. When administrating initiatives, the admin can't sort them by signature number. Describe the solution you'd like As a user, I want to be able to access to all initiatives on the same index by clicking on the filters I want. As an admin, I want to be able to sort initiatives by number of signatures. Describe alternatives you've considered None Additional context See linked mockupFunded by AN Does this issue could impact on users private data? No
  • 07/04/2020 14:53
  • New proposal at Propose new functionalities for Decidim software
    Ability to ban users or IP addresses
    **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** Decidim comes with a content moderation tool which is cool.However, this does not provide the ability to ban whole user accounts or possibly IP addresses. This is necessary in order to moderate the content on the website correctly.We have had reports of such users spamming the content section full of junk content and advertisements. It is quite a big job to go over all these posts individually and moderate them as we are not even requiring the users to confirm their email address to allow them on the platform. **Describe the solution you'd like** There should be new moderation tools available for the system:Ban a user accountHide all content (automatically moderate it) posted by the banned account (this should be optional as there can be still users with valid content banned otherwise)Ban IP addresses (the user accounts are already storing the last IP address they used, so this information can be further utilized for the IP ban)**Describe alternatives you've considered** Currently we are adding the IP bans directly to the server configuration which is inconvenient to manage. **Additional context** There could be also automatic banning measures, e.g. if the same user has 5 messages hidden by moderation during the last hour, they are automatically banned. **Does this issue could impact on users private data?** Yes, storing of the IP address. But Decidim is already doing that.
  • 07/04/2020 12:51
  • New proposal at Propose new functionalities for Decidim software
    My proposal to reduce noise
    ** ¿Tu solicitud de nueva funcionalidad está relacionada con un problema?** Una descripción clara y concisa de cuál es el problema. Ej: "Siempre estoy frustrado cuando [...]" ** Describe la solución que deseas ** Una descripción clara y concisa de lo que quieres que suceda. ** Describe alternativas que hayas considerado ** Una descripción clara y concisa de cualquier solución o característica alternativa que haya considerado. ** Contexto adicional ** Agrega cualquier otro contexto o capturas de pantalla sobre la solicitud de función aquí. ** ¿Este problema podría afectar los datos privados de los usuarios? ** Ej. problemas relacionados con el proceso de registro / inicio de sesión del usuario, verificaciones, invitaciones, datos confidenciales como correo electrónico, direcciones IP, etc
  • 06/04/2020 13:44
  • New proposal at Propose new functionalities for Decidim software
    Ability to hide and show questions when editing questionnaire
    Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. The experience of editing the questions of a questionnaire tends to be quite uncomfortable when the questionnaire has more than two questions. Describe the solution you'd like If questions could be collapsed to occupy the minimum space, showing only title and move up/down buttons, the experience would improve considerably. Additional context It is important to note that as part of this feature, the question title should be the question statement instead of e.g. "Question 3" There's a bug already reported in Github about "Move up" and "Move down" buttons not being updated after dragging questions to reorder them. Could this issue impact on users private data? Not at all.
  • 03/04/2020 15:23
  • New proposal at Propose new functionalities for Decidim software
    Better UX - Make the listing cards more simple
    **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**I don't like how cluttered the listing cards are with information. E.g. proposal cards or process cards, why do we need to show so many things on the cards? Such as how many people are following it, when it was created, etc. And with the process cards we are showing 3 dates: start date, end date and creation date (which by the way does not have a label).Is the user really interested in all this? Especially the follows section is quite obfuscated in case the user is already following the participatory space. Why do we even show this to the user if they are already following it? And the button says "you are already following..." and then when you click it, it states "stop following". Even I would find it hard to understand if I didn't use Decidim before. **Describe the solution you'd like**Remove all unnecessary details from the cards. E.g. proposal card we are only interested about:Proposal titleProposal descriptionPossibly: number of commentsPossibly: number of supports (when supports are enabled)On the process cards I'm interested about:Process titleProcess descriptionCluttering these elements with a lot of information brings many accessibility issues, not only visually confusing but also confusing for the screen reader users. Most of this information does not need to be always visible on the cards.**Describe alternatives you've considered**Just hide most of the additional details on the cards. **Additional context**In some cases it can be justified to show some extra information, such as the meeting dates. However, with proposals, processes, etc. we're not generally that interested in those dates that they would have to be shown on the cards. Users can still get that information on the process pages. **Does this issue could impact on users private data?** Nope.
  • 03/04/2020 14:08
  • New proposal at Propose new functionalities for Decidim software
    Adding icons to pages and topics
    **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**Our client would like to add icons to the pages and topics to visually differentiate different types of pages and topics on the "Help" pages. **Describe the solution you'd like**Add possibility to define icons for pages and topics. **Describe alternatives you've considered**The whole CMS should be thought out from ground up, as the current CMS features of Decidim are very limited. This could be part of thinking how to manage content and navigational structures within the system in the bigger picture (e.g. navigating Metadecidim to find the feature proposal form takes 4 clicks if you're already signed in, is this good usability?). **Additional context** Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.Related ideas:Allow defining static page content using the content blocksAllow adding multiple same type of content blocks on pagePossibility to configure the top level navigationPossibility to configure the participatory space navigation **Does this issue could impact on users private data?*Nope.
  • 03/04/2020 13:53
  • New proposal at Report a Bug
    Some activity types are never shown on activities block/page
    Copy of : https://github.com/decidim/decidim/issues/5926Types not shown are Assembly, Consultation, Initiative and Participatory process.This is specially relevant in the 'all activities' page, where those types can even be selected in the left side filter, to always result in an empty list.All the affected types are Participable and don't have a participatory_space.
  • 01/04/2020 15:25
  • New proposal at Report a Bug
    Posting a comment is very slow
    Has anyone else noticed that only recently it takes ages (in computer terms) to post a comment? This seems to apply to the very latest versions of Decidim, I've noticed this in the current development versions as well as Metadecidim. It used to be "lightning" fast compared to the current situation.I just posted a comment on Metadecidim and timed it took more than 15 seconds for the comment to appear in the UI. This seems wrong, it should be instantly visible or take maximum of 2 seconds.
Aquest projecte està cofinançat pel Fons Europeu de Desenvolupament Regional de la Unió Europea.
FEDER
Creative Commons License Website made with free software.

Please sign in

Forgot your password?

Or