This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about cookies.
Skip to main content
Metadecidim's official logo
  • English Triar la llengua Elegir el idioma Choose language
    • Català
    • Castellano
Sign Up Sign In
  • Home
  • Processes
  • Assemblies
  • Initiatives
  • Consultations
  • Conferences
  • Help

Propose new functionalities for Decidim software

#DecidimRoadmap Designing Decidim together

Phase 1 of 1
Open 2019-01-01 - 2030-12-31
Process phases Submit a proposal
  • The process
  • Debates
  • Propose new features
  • News
chevron-left Back to list

Budgets PX enhancements

Avatar: Lucas Hamani Lucas Hamani
22/02/2019 11:00  
Accepted / In progress

As of today, most of our clients (@OSP) use Decidim for participatory budgets and we have been collecting users (participants in this case) feedbacks for the last few months.

Most of them point towards the lack of clarity from the workflow. Here are a few examples of the feedback we have had :
- "I wasn't sure my vote was taken into account since I didn't receive any mail confirmation and I didn't make out any visual differences in the design before and after I voted.
- "After I selected the projects I wanted to support, I had not notice that I had to confirm my choices for my vote to be saved" => we observed that 20% to 25% of participants don't go through with the confirmation process for every participatory budget we are involved with.
- "There was a very long list of projects to choose from. The actual design of the projects makes it hard to identify quickly what the project is about and what category it belongs to. Going through all the pages, I was afraid to miss out on a project I really wanted to support".

We propose to address those participants difficulties through a series of enhancements. We already started to work on some of them, others are still works in progress. You can find them here => https://github.com/OpenSourcePolitics/decidim/milestone/23.

We plan to test and iterate on them during the coming weeks before considering any merge.

  • Filter results for category: Budgets Budgets

This proposal has been accepted and is under development

  • Has been reviewed by Decidim Product and complies with the Social Contract
  • It is funded by Angers
  • Developed by Open Source Politics 
  • Waiting for PR

List of Endorsements

Avatar: Pau Parals Pau Parals verified-badge
Avatar: Ivan Vergés Ivan Vergés verified-badge
Avatar: Oliver Valls Oliver Valls
Avatar: Leo Leo
Avatar: Antti Hukkanen Antti Hukkanen
Avatar: Katja Henttonen Katja Henttonen
Avatar: Pauline Bessoles Pauline Bessoles verified-badge
and 4 more people (see more) (see less)
Endorsements count7
Budgets PX enhancements Comments 12

Reference: MDC-PROP-2019-02-14275
Version number 2 (of 2) see other versions
Check fingerprint

Fingerprint

The piece of text below is a shortened, hashed representation of this content. It's useful to ensure the content hasn't been tampered with, as a single modification would result in a totally different value.

Value: bd6ebaefc18602ffb82be3d7ea4b6015186bd43723280005df6303eb0c793212

Source: {"body":{"en":"As of today, most of our clients (@OSP) use Decidim for participatory budgets and we have been collecting users (participants in this case) feedbacks for the last few months. \r\n\r\nMost of them point towards the lack of clarity from the workflow. Here are a few examples of the feedback we have had :\r\n- \"I wasn't sure my vote was taken into account since I didn't receive any mail confirmation and I didn't make out any visual differences in the design before and after I voted.\r\n- \"After I selected the projects I wanted to support, I had not notice that I had to confirm my choices for my vote to be saved\" => we observed that 20% to 25% of participants don't go through with the confirmation process for every participatory budget we are involved with.\r\n- \"There was a very long list of projects to choose from. The actual design of the projects makes it hard to identify quickly what the project is about and what category it belongs to. Going through all the pages, I was afraid to miss out on a project I really wanted to support\".\r\n\r\nWe propose to address those participants difficulties through a series of enhancements. We already started to work on some of them, others are still works in progress. You can find them here => https://github.com/OpenSourcePolitics/decidim/milestone/23.\r\n\r\nWe plan to test and iterate on them during the coming weeks before considering any merge."},"title":{"en":"Budgets PX enhancements"}}

This fingerprint is calculated using a SHA256 hashing algorithm. In order to replicate it yourself, you can use an MD5 calculator online and copy-paste the source data.

Share:

link-intact Share link

Share link:

Please paste this code in your page:

<script src="https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/14275/embed.js"></script>
<noscript><iframe src="https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/14275/embed.html" frameborder="0" scrolling="vertical"></iframe></noscript>

Report inappropriate content

Is this content inappropriate?

Reason

Comment details

Order by:
  • Older
    • Best rated
    • Recent
    • Older
    • Most discussed
You are seeing a single comment

View all comments

Avatar: Pauline Bessoles Pauline Bessoles verified-badge
23/11/2020 19:01
  • Get link Get link

I agree, it's confusing, we can make specific proposals to ease the process!

Loading comments ...

  • Terms and conditions of use
  • About the community
  • Download Open Data files
  • Metadecidim at Twitter Twitter
  • Metadecidim at Instagram Instagram
  • Metadecidim at YouTube YouTube
  • Metadecidim at GitHub GitHub
Creative Commons License Website made with free software.
Decidim Logo

Confirm

OK Cancel

Please sign in

decidim Sign in with Decidim Barcelona
Or

Sign up

Forgot your password?