This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about cookies.
Skip to main content
Metadecidim's official logo
  • English Triar la llengua Elegir el idioma Choose language
    • Català
    • Castellano
Sign Up Sign In
  • Home
  • Processes
  • Assemblies
  • Initiatives
  • Consultations
  • Conferences
  • Help

Propose new functionalities for Decidim software

#DecidimRoadmap Designing Decidim together

Phase 1 of 1
Open 2019-01-01 - 2030-12-31
Process phases Submit a proposal
  • The process
  • Debates
  • Propose new features
  • News
chevron-left Back to list

Delete button for a participatory space

Avatar: CodiTramuntana CodiTramuntana verified-badge
02/07/2019 12:01  

Hi!

We have a client who is interested in studying the functionality of a delete button. Our purpose would be to reopen the debate to clarify the possibilities and behavior of functionality.

First, I will add the discussions in the meta.decidim:
https://meta.decidim.org/processes/bug-report/f/210/proposals/14298
https://meta.decidim.org/processes/bug-report/f/210/proposals/12283

In fact, for the surveys component, it was discussed that it was possible to eliminate the component if there is no ansewrs. https://github.com/OpenSourcePolitics/decidim/pull/211. Now, we want to discuss to delete a participatory space.

The discussion is at this point: https://github.com/decidim/decidim/issues/4958#issuecomment-490494630 As @andres said, I open this proposal in order to discuss. Also, @oriol points out a very interesting topic to take into account: https://github.com/decidim/decidim/pull/4641.

Thanks

  • Filter results for category: Administration Administration

List of Endorsements

Avatar: Pauline Bessoles Pauline Bessoles verified-badge
Endorsements count1
Delete button for a participatory space Comments 2

Reference: MDC-PROP-2019-07-14671
Version number 1 (of 1) see other versions
Check fingerprint

Fingerprint

The piece of text below is a shortened, hashed representation of this content. It's useful to ensure the content hasn't been tampered with, as a single modification would result in a totally different value.

Value: 6855517bba37f17e4d143bd541f9181b727ed0bc720733ab45d1c15e6c4f9e05

Source: {"body":{"es":"Hi!\r\n\r\nWe have a client who is interested in studying the functionality of a delete button. Our purpose would be to reopen the debate to clarify the possibilities and behavior of functionality.\r\n\r\nFirst, I will add the discussions in the meta.decidim:\r\nhttps://meta.decidim.org/processes/bug-report/f/210/proposals/14298\r\nhttps://meta.decidim.org/processes/bug-report/f/210/proposals/12283\r\n\r\nIn fact, for the surveys component, it was discussed that it was possible to eliminate the component if there is no ansewrs. https://github.com/OpenSourcePolitics/decidim/pull/211. Now, we want to discuss to delete a participatory space. \r\n\r\nThe discussion is at this point: https://github.com/decidim/decidim/issues/4958#issuecomment-490494630 As @andres said, I open this proposal in order to discuss. Also, @oriol points out a very interesting topic to take into account: https://github.com/decidim/decidim/pull/4641. \r\n\r\nThanks"},"title":{"es":"Delete button for a participatory space"}}

This fingerprint is calculated using a SHA256 hashing algorithm. In order to replicate it yourself, you can use an MD5 calculator online and copy-paste the source data.

Share:

link-intact Share link

Share link:

Please paste this code in your page:

<script src="https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/14671/embed.js"></script>
<noscript><iframe src="https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/14671/embed.html" frameborder="0" scrolling="vertical"></iframe></noscript>

Report inappropriate content

Is this content inappropriate?

Reason

Comment details

Order by:
  • Older
    • Best rated
    • Recent
    • Older
    • Most discussed
You are seeing a single comment

View all comments

Avatar: CodiTramuntana CodiTramuntana verified-badge
04/07/2019 15:08
  • Get link Get link

Thanks @carol. Our proposal also goes in this direction. We are thinking of a button to "archive". Currently, the "archive" function is available in "moderation". When a comment is reported, it can be "archived". The behavior is that the proposal / comment disappears and the account is no longer counted.

If a process is "archived":
-Warning of what components with content are you hiding
-Traceable on admin log
-It is saved in the "archived" folder
-The content and components disappear from the states and metrics
- It's not possible to recover it (as proposals does)

Loading comments ...

  • Terms and conditions of use
  • About the community
  • Download Open Data files
  • Metadecidim at Twitter Twitter
  • Metadecidim at Instagram Instagram
  • Metadecidim at YouTube YouTube
  • Metadecidim at GitHub GitHub
Creative Commons License Website made with free software.
Decidim Logo

Confirm

OK Cancel

Please sign in

decidim Sign in with Decidim
Or

Sign up

Forgot your password?