This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about cookies.
Skip to main content
Metadecidim's official logo
  • English Triar la llengua Elegir el idioma Choose language
    • Català
    • Castellano
Sign Up Sign In
  • Home
  • Processes
  • Assemblies
  • Initiatives
  • Consultations
  • Conferences
  • Help

Propose new functionalities for Decidim software

#DecidimRoadmap Designing Decidim together

Phase 1 of 1
Open 2019-01-01 - 2030-12-31
Process phases Submit a proposal
  • The process
  • Debates
  • Propose new features
  • News
chevron-left Back to list

Improvements for the participatory texts module

Avatar: Ariadna Vila Ariadna Vila
04/02/2021 15:48  

Lately I’ve been working with the participatory texts module and so I’ve found some improvements that we could make to the modul. 

1) To add an option to download the final text once it has been amended and modified. 

This should be done from the back office. The file must maintain paragraphs and separations, regardless of the sections into which the text is divided. 

2) When importing a text, the draft or edition section is confusing. 

One way to improve this is to not make it mandatory to add a title in every section in which the text is divided. 

On the public view of the text, a title won’t be displayed if there’s no title; at this time a default number is displayed as title if there's no text. 

3) Disable the possibility of amending when “accepted”

If the option to provide “response” (accept, reject) is enabled, and the admin “accepts” one section of the text (after the amendment process), it should no longer be possible to amend that part of the text as it is considered to be finished.

4) Remove the obligation to amend the title. 

When someone wants to add an amendment or when the admin wants to edit the text from the back office, It’s always have to change the title, even if you don’t want to. 

I think that these changes can improve a lot the use of the participatory texts module. What do you think?



  • Filter results for category: Participatory texts Participatory texts

List of Endorsements

Avatar: Nil Homedes Nil Homedes verified-badge
Avatar: Oliver Azevedo Barnes Oliver Azevedo Barnes
Avatar: Romy Grasgruber-Kerl Romy Grasgruber-Kerl
Avatar: Dave Frey Dave Frey
Avatar: Alexander Rusa Alexander Rusa
and 2 more people (see more) (see less)
Endorsements count5
Improvements for the participatory texts module Comments 5

Reference: MDC-PROP-2021-02-16221
Version number 1 (of 1) see other versions
Check fingerprint

Fingerprint

The piece of text below is a shortened, hashed representation of this content. It's useful to ensure the content hasn't been tampered with, as a single modification would result in a totally different value.

Value: 2b5aac74218f8ff83c687c29087bf207d8f7d33e84c19eb8d1dfc5b97f314267

Source: {"body":{"ca":"<p>Lately I’ve been working with the participatory texts module and so I’ve found some improvements that we could make to the modul.&nbsp;</p><p><strong>1) To add an option to download the final text once it has been amended and modified.&nbsp;</strong></p><p>This should be done from the back office. The file must maintain paragraphs and separations, regardless of the sections into which the text is divided.&nbsp;</p><p><strong>2) When importing a text, the draft or edition section is confusing.&nbsp;</strong></p><p>One way to improve this is to not make it mandatory to add a title in every section in which the text is divided.&nbsp;</p><p>On the public view of the text, a title won’t be displayed if there’s no title; at this time a default number is displayed as title if there's no text.&nbsp;</p><p><strong>3) Disable the possibility of amending when “accepted”</strong></p><p>If the option to provide “response” (accept, reject) is enabled, and the admin “accepts” one section of the text (after the amendment process), it should no longer be possible to amend that part of the text as it is considered to be finished.</p><p><strong>4) Remove the obligation to amend the title.&nbsp;</strong></p><p>When someone wants to add an amendment or when the admin wants to edit the text from the back office, It’s always have to change the title, even if you don’t want to.&nbsp;</p><p>I think that these changes can improve a lot the use of the participatory texts module. What do you think? </p><p><br></p><p><br></p>"},"title":{"ca":"Improvements for the participatory texts module"}}

This fingerprint is calculated using a SHA256 hashing algorithm. In order to replicate it yourself, you can use an MD5 calculator online and copy-paste the source data.

Share:

link-intact Share link

Share link:

Please paste this code in your page:

<script src="https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/16221/embed.js"></script>
<noscript><iframe src="https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/16221/embed.html" frameborder="0" scrolling="vertical"></iframe></noscript>

Report inappropriate content

Is this content inappropriate?

Reason

Comment details

Order by:
  • Older
    • Best rated
    • Recent
    • Older
    • Most discussed
You are seeing a single comment

View all comments

Conversation with Virgile Deville
Avatar: Virgile Deville Virgile Deville
15/03/2021 21:07
  • Get link Get link

Always thought Pubpub was the best software for participatory text editing : https://www.pubpub.org

Avatar: Romy Grasgruber-Kerl Romy Grasgruber-Kerl
16/03/2021 09:10
  • Get link Get link

Thanks, that definitely helps!

Loading comments ...

  • Terms and conditions of use
  • About the community
  • Download Open Data files
  • Metadecidim at Twitter Twitter
  • Metadecidim at Instagram Instagram
  • Metadecidim at YouTube YouTube
  • Metadecidim at GitHub GitHub
Creative Commons License Website made with free software.
Decidim Logo

Confirm

OK Cancel

Please sign in

decidim Sign in with Decidim
Or

Sign up

Forgot your password?