Redesign Decidim

Terminology: sometimes one word in one part of the back-office means another thing in another part;
Action button clarity: it might be difficult for new administrators to figure out what do certain buttons do - learning and understanding it takes quite some time;
Dealing with much content: some big cities or institutions that receive a lot of proposals might get lost in them and there is no way to find your way in it - it is not only a question of filters, but also in permissions. Having too many concertations is also a recurring challenge - they get lost pretty easily and the ones that are finished are not archived in another page but included in the list among active concertations.
Too many options and fields - some of them are not clearly described and so the administrators often don’t understand their purpose.

More consistency in terminology;
Helper tooltip explaining the purpose of different terms, spaces and buttons.

Hierarchy: it is often difficult to understand in what stage of hierarchy are you situated as an administrator - are you in a concertation or a sub-concertation, is this budget in this space or in another one;
Multiple spots to do the same task: module configuration and phases, welcome page customisation - these two and other tasks are managed in at least two different spots and often overlap, which is difficult to understand for new administrators. Technically it might make sense, but UX wise (where you would like to have a one stop shop for a single task) - not at all.

Aesthetic overhaul (to be as good as the new front redesign)
More strategically used colours and icons
More animations 🙂