Changes at "2.3.1. "

• -

  1.Amendment submission: Association members can create amendment proposals all year long on a dedicated Metadecidim component, in two categories:
• -

• Minor corrections 

• -

• Amendments or additions based on actual practice within the community. They must include: an explanation of why it’s an improvement to the regulation. An example of how or when it was experimented

• -

2. Proposal selection: The Coordination Committee eliminates the proposals which are invalid based on the following criteria:

• -

• proposals out of the scope of application of the internal regulation.

• -

• proposals going against the social contract.

• -

• proposals going against the statutes. 

• -

• proposals based on anticipation rather than on reality.

• -

3. Community questions: All the community can comment during a minimum of two weeks on the amendments proposals, to understand the proposal better and ask for clarifications. The proposing party is responsible to respond to requests for clarification.

4. Community feedback: All the community can comment for a minimum of 2 weeks on the amendments proposals, to give feedback to the amendments proposals, andexpress concerns, suggestions, or doubts. The proposing party may no longer respond to discussion. 

5. Feedback integration: During a minimum of 2 weeks, the proposer improves or withdraws the proposal based on community feedback.

6. Objection harvesting: During a minimum of two weeks, the Community and the Coordination Committee perform a final check on the proposal amendments before the General Assembly vote, to ensure the proposal is still valid in regard to step 2. 

7. General Assembly Vote: The final amendments shall be presented for approval by the General Assembly.