This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about cookies.
Skip to main content
Metadecidim's official logo
  • English Triar la llengua Elegir el idioma Choose language
    • Català
    • Castellano
Sign Up Sign In
  • Home
  • Processes
  • Assemblies
  • Initiatives
  • Consultations
  • Conferences
  • Help

Decidim.GOV: Democratic Governance for an open community

#decidimgov Internal organization, democracy and decision making

Phase 8 of 8
Accountability 2019-02-17 - 2019-02-28
Process phases
  • The process
  • Meetings
  • Proposals
  • Statutes proposal
  • Internal regulations proposal
  • Statutes approval
  • Coordination Committee Approval
  • News
More
  • Coordination Committee Approval
  • News
This is a collaborative draft for a proposal. This means that you can help their authors to shape the proposal using the comment section below or improve it directly by requesting access to edit it. Once the authors grant you access, you'll be able to make changes to this draft.
chevron-left Back

[EN] To create a Technological Committee. [ES] Creación del Comité Tecnológico

21/12/2018 10:41  
Published

[EN] The technology committee is responsible for giving guidance in architecture, evaluating large changes in the code, refactorings, integrations. This team must work hand in hand with the technical office and the product committee.

[ES] El comité tecnológico es el responsable de dar orientaciones en la arquitectura, evaluar grandes cambios en el código, refactorizaciones, integraciones. Este equipo debe trabajar de la mano de la oficina técnica y el comité de producto.

  • Filter results for category: 3. Organizational structure (organs and functions)3. Organizational structure (organs and functions)
final proposal
This draft is finished. Check out the final proposal
published proposal
see version history for this proposal
  • people 3
  • pencil 3
  • comment-square 4
Reference: MDC-COLL-2018-12-24

Share:

link-intact Share link

Share link:

Report inappropriate content

Is this content inappropriate?

Reason

Comment details

Order by:
  • Older
    • Best rated
    • Recent
    • Older
    • Most discussed
You are seeing a single comment

View all comments

Conversation with Virgile Deville
Avatar: Virgile Deville Virgile Deville
19/12/2018 15:30
  • Get link Get link

@xabier do you think we have some kind of committee responsible for creating and formalizing processes?
For decentralized organization there is generally to options :
- embracing chaos which gives a lot of latitude for innovation and independance but makes progressing in a single direction hard to track
- formalizing the way we work and handle things in a couple basic processes which we enforce to gain clarity an efficiency.

I think Decidim would fit more in the later. Though maybe a committee for processes might be too much, maybe each committee should be transparent and have a responsability to document its processes.

Avatar: Xabier Xabier verified-badge
19/12/2018 15:45
  • Get link Get link

Each participatory process should have a "promoting group" or a team that formalized it. Sometimes there is also "follow-up team" ("comité de seguimient") which is a team or working group or committee with representatives of the diverse sub-groups and interest of the process, and it monitors and evaluates (as a "democratic guarantee team") the procedure of the process, we have one of these for the governance process for example. Not sure I fully answered your question.

Loading comments ...

  • Terms and conditions of use
  • About the community
  • Download Open Data files
  • Metadecidim at Twitter Twitter
  • Metadecidim at Instagram Instagram
  • Metadecidim at YouTube YouTube
  • Metadecidim at GitHub GitHub
Creative Commons License Website made with free software.
Decidim Logo

Confirm

OK Cancel

Please sign in

decidim Sign in with Decidim Barcelona
Or

Sign up

Forgot your password?