Aquest lloc web fa servir cookies pròpies i de tercers per millorar l’experiència de navegació, i oferir continguts i serveis d’interès. En continuar la navegació entenem que acceptes la nostra política de cookies. Per a més informació consulta aquí.
Aquest projecte està cofinançat pel Fons Europeu de Desenvolupament Regional de la Unió Europea.
7 comentaris
Conversa amb Virgile Deville
It's good idea to incentivize participation in the community and contribution to the software.
We should specify how time spent for the community is valued, tracked and accounted for because otherwise it won't be possible to actually implement this idea.
I think this is very hard to measure :-( Not sure we have to explain it for this Governance MVP or simply leave the door open. If we simply state that contributors can do so by means of non-monetary contributions I would not yet (for the MVP) connect this to any specific rights. And we should specify this latter.
Agree with you @xabier let's not over complexify things for now.
For now I suggest, we draw a clear line to separate financial membership contribution from more immaterial contribution such as time invested in contributions for the project.
In the future we could look into bounty systems, open task list etc. which value can prevaluated and makes these things easier to track.
It could be nice to come out for some system in the future. Sure!
Organizations that already contribute a lot won't have the incentive to pay. How will monetary contributions be compared with "work" contributions? Will both lead to the same "rights"?
I don't know! To be honest, I think this is complicated. I would start with monetary contributions, and maybe see how this can be substituted by other forms of contribution.
Creo que se pueden establecer este tipo de contribuciones no monetarias o a entidades pequeñas sin ánimo de lucro o personas independientes.
Deixa el teu comentari
Inicia la sessió amb el teu compte o registra't per afegir el teu comentari.
Carregant els comentaris ...